Well, I would assume Coco would be the second character. I mean, she has some stages already in Warped and is a prominent character in the second and third game. Crunch is the only other character I can think of but he isn't introduced until later on. Edit: after reading the article, my theory appears to be correct. If so, I'm even more interested in this trilogy than before. I mean, I've had plenty of waifus since Coco, but she was one of my first back in the day.
Well, Nintendo should make note that allowing for either more games to be added or for a cartridge port that can play actual cartridges is the way to make these plug and play consoles. Also, making them readily available helps. Granted, I'm not enough of a retro enthusiast to invest in one so take what I say with a grain of salt, but if I were to get one those are features that would be important to me.
And so called "professional journalists" pretend that Sony never announces games that are coming soon. On a side note, why do all the biggest posts seem to be about the lack of B/C on PS4 or this topic about how Sony announces games with later release dates? Is it a slow day for news?
You have to realize by now that no matter how many times people try to spin this topic in unique ways it's still unoriginal because everyone in the Xbox camp is doing it. Also, it's not a "secret weapon" because it isn't a secret. Lastly, if MS wants to catch up to Sony it needs a secret nuke, not some wimpy handgun.
Statistics like lifetime sales figures for each system?
How is showing longterm releases "cheating"? A) We're not stupid and we know that if a game isn't going to be released for a while we won't be playing it tomorrow. B) It's good to know about future support for our favourite systems too. C) Not all the games they show are far off in the distant future. D) Not all exclusives get featured on their stage show. Some are just featured on the showfloor and that's still very much part of Sony's E3. Also, Sony a...
I'm pretty sure Sony never argued that B/C is a bad thing. It just wouldn't be profitable for them to do right now. If they rolled it out in the first year or two of the PS4, then maybe it would have been worth it, but right now not so much. The Switch is doing fairly well in spite of not having a VC up yet (which I think they should get on ASAP). Of course it's getting Wii U ports but those are akin to upgraded PS4 ports of PS3 titles. All I'm saying is, don't hate t...
Umm...The Order is unbelievably short for a full-priced retail release and the story never got finished. But, I think the game is great in every other aspect. I never did understand the hate for corridor shooters anyways, and I probably never will. Plus I love the old English architecture and just the general aesthetic of the game, which at the time pushed the envelope.
So...it's a re-release that includes some of the DLC? If so I might be interested. I'm not really into DLC-feats that cost an arm and a leg but that's the one thing keeping me from staying up to date on what I think is an awesome and underrated series.
This is the first I've ever heard of resentment towards the 3DS. Are the "fans" in this article people or ethereal constructs created by the author to justify a clickbaity article? And since when is supporting a system after the launch of a new one a bad thing? I actually prefer when companies don't just drop their old systems the second a new one is released.
Well, if they were to implement BC the time to do so would have been ages ago. Now there are enough PS4 games out that I don't need it. Also, I still have my PS3 so if I want to play PS3 games I have the means to do so.
Uphill battle? It's their E3 to lose. MS has an uphill battle in trying to sell us on their new hardware and close the massive gap between them and Sony.
I think it may be a brilliant move. MS has been on the defensive this gen with Sony leading the charge. I have no doubt the Scorpio will be more powerful, but it will likely be more expensive too, and if it is at the same price as the Pro, Sony can just drop its price and then it won't be. Between that and Sony's bigger library of exclusives they still have the upper hand.
Well, the first time was already the charm for Sony, they just didn't have as much success the second time, but that's due largely to them sabotaging their own system's success and literally having third parties carry it. The Vita could have worked kind of like the Switch. I would say it still can, but a Vita is a hard sell these days and Sony would also have to go back to actually supporting that and making it happen, which they won't. If they should decide to invest in a ...
I haven't actually checked out a Fire Emblem game since Awakening, and I haven't even finished that, though I did enjoy it for what it's worth. I kind of do want to catch up on this series though. That said, it sounds like I should finish Awakening, and I think there were other games released before this latest one that I should also check out first. Have they and their DLC gone down in price or have they followed Nintendo's ripoff rule of never dropping the price unless so...
I checked out the bundle of the first game and that firefly game a while back and remember really enjoying this one. I didn't get very far into that firefly game before adding it to my backlog but I played all the way through Yomawari and enjoyed it for what it's worth. Judging by the trailer the sequel looks to do what every good sequel should and improve on the original in terms of visuals and content. It looks like there will be a greater variety of locations of both the indoor ...
And it's no wonder why I'm a PlayStation fan. Way to go Sony!
No mechanic in and of itself makes a game better. It's how it's implemented that determines whether the game is good or not. Yes, I do think open worlds are a tad overrated, but I also know why they're popular. I like them when they're done well, but not so much when they're not done well. Travelling between points can be kind of annoying, especially if there are no waypoints or other means of fast travel. Confusion on where to go is also really annoying, especially i...
True, the original Persona 4 had the choice whether to date a girl whose social link you maxed out, but there was no consequence to deciding to date all of them. Golden added a Valentine's Day portion where you feel like a douche for stringing them all along, and it looks like Persona 5 has something similar, which was what I was remarking on.
WTF? I'm not one of those people who don't believe English dubs can be solid and I'll definitely stand by my favourites, but this is some of the most cringey voice acting I've ever heard. Um...there's a dual audio option right?