I will see and play that footage as will many others. Stop acting as if pc gamers wont be able to run it. Btw, when/how has EA or dice lied about how the game will look? They showed PC footage, it looked great. How is that lying? If your mad that the console version doesn't look exactly the same (still looks great, nonetheless) then there is no hope for YOU.
I really wish I could see a serious response to my questions but you only have 1 bubble >_>
You played both already? Lucky...
/s
Yea the knife blocks sound cool as hell
Well said. I absolutely love steam but I'm not bound to it... i have no problem trying a new platform.
I wonder if they will let you play the beta based on what platform you got MOH or any platform of your choosing. For example, I bought MOH on ps3 but I REALLY want to play the beta on PC.
the first one was great. It was tough, immersive, and looked beautiful (pc). My only complaint were the controls. I felt they could have been a little tighter and more intuitive.
0_0 you don't consider spending $5000 "going all out" already? Lol
I too built my PC that year with that hardware. I held off on a new processor and got a gtx570. I know my e8400 is bottlenecking it, which is why ill upgrade that before the game comes out.
@simonkey
Same here, I finally have a reason to upgrade to an i7 from my trusty old core 2 duo. I surpass everything else though.
And to think, people thought you needed a super computer to play this game.
I don't really have a problem dealing with snipers but they do get annoying when they are on my team and are not working towards the objective. That said, maybe taking a page out of team fortress 2 and limiting the amount players that can be a certain class at any given time (in this case the recon class) is a possible solution?
While the source engine has somehow managed to look great throughout the years, too hope a new engine is being used for episode 3.
No...
And mw3 IS doing something new and different?
I know mw3 will probably get more sales than bf3 but I think bf3 will he the better game and as long as they can get close to and/or severely dent mw3's sales, they wil be the fps victors this year. They will show that the cod series is starting to crumble unless they innovate like they did with cod4.
Also, lets not forget the massive amount of PC digital download preorders that are rolling in. Those sales are never counted but I'm sure bf3 will outsell mw3 on that platform.
@fluffy delusions
U also have to realize that they were running the game at really high resolutions and most gamers have 1080p monitors which a $300 gtx570 can handle just fine.
Common sense would be buying a windows based laptop with the same features and speed for less than half the price of the Mac, but that's a whole other discussion. My point is that you'd be surprised at how easily a college kid can justify things like a $500 24" 3dtv to their parents... and end up getting it.
$500 too much for college kids huh? Then where are all these college kids getting $2000 macbooks from?
Same here, except I have a PC + ps3 combo.
Because u can get a gtx 260 for $100 and easily max out bc2 with a decent quad core CPU. This leads me to believe that he has an older or lower-end card than a 260...which is already 3 years old. I k ow this cuz that's the card I used to play bc2 :)
As for bf3, we will have to wait for the recommended specs and beta to know how well it runs
Oh please... don't compare cod's yearly release schedule with battlefield. Battlefield 2 came out 6 years ago bro.