Suuuure buddy, keep telling yourself that. Sony have copied tons of stuff from MS this generation. Sony is following, not innovating.
Microsoft had different console SKUs (Premium, Core, etc.) this generation long before Sony even came on the scene with the PS3. Sony copied virtually every element of what MS had done with their online service, from gamer cards and game invites to achievements and the video marketplace. Your post is a joke. Seriously, it's completely off bas...
Sony droids at their finest... sigh.
You're an idiot. I hope you know that.
Why in the hel would anybody go out and pay several hundred dollars to buy a new system when they could get their console fixed for free? That has got to be the most illogical argument ever. You ps3 fanboys are so funny...always coming up with excuses for how well the 360 is doing instead of just giving the 360 its due props.
If you don't have proof, don't bother writing.
Microsoft aren't going to just claim some BS that could easily be disproved, making them look very bad. If they say it, I can guarantee you that it is pretty much the truth.
If it were false, you would expect Sony to come back with some proof that it isn't true...which they haven't done. You would expect at least SOMEBODY to come forward and show how it isn't true, and yet...nothing.
No, but he is showing how hypocritical you all are. Look, Sony is Microsoft's closest competitor in the video game market, of course they are going to pay attention to how well they are doing versus their competitor. I don't know why that would be surprising at all.
Sony is far more arrogant. Seriously, everybody just wanted them to shut up when they kept going on about how "next generation doesn't start until we say it does" and all that crap.
That's lame. The 360 has sold more than the ps3 this year in North America, which is the biggest region for video games. It is really close in Europe, even though we obviously don't have all the numbers. And it has been doing better in Japan, which almost nobody thought possible. The fact is, the 360 has sold much better than the original Xbox and has gained market share over the Playstation brand, while the PS3 has sold far less than half as well as the PS2 and has lost massive amounts o...
It's not even close. The Miis look like crap in comparison to the avatars. They don't even have hands or feet for hell's sake. If the 360's avatars looked like Miis I really would have been annoyed with them. As they are though, I think they actually turned out to be quite cool. I have had fun customizing my avatar and seeing my friends' avatars. It makes the whole experience seem much more personalized.
But the face you are left with still doesn't look anything like you with the Mii system. I didn't think that guy's Mii looked anything like him, did you? I mean, I would never see that Mii and go "hey look, it's dave" (or whatever the guy's name is). That's silly.
I thought I wasn't going to like the avatars, but they are actually pretty cool. They add a touch of personality to the console and I really like going to my friends channel and actually seeing their digital representations standing there. I have really ended up liking it a lot.
Except you're wrong, the Miis are a borrowed idea. You honestly didn't think that Nintendo invented them, did you? Anyway, the avatars on the 360 are worlds better anyway.
White Knight Chronicles has not even come out yet, so how can you sit there and act like you know it is going to be better than another game? You don't know any such thing...it could flop for all you know.
The 360 still has a lot more RPGs by the way. That is one of the reasons I love it. I'm an RPG guy.
I think the 360 has the better games, period. Gears 2 alone blows away everything else.
Every time we ask ps3 fanboys to prove they have a 360 they never manage to provide us with their gamertags, so I wouldn't just assume that ps3king doesn't have a PS3. All I know is that I have given out my PSN ID and gamertag lots of times on this forum and it never seems to shut anybody up anyway.
@cmrbe
Keep spouting your BS. Too bad none of it is true. The 360 had 46 games in 2008 that scored over 80, whereas the ps3 had 43. http://www.metacritic.com/g... http://www.metacritic.com/g... The 360 had more good games in 2008 than the ps3. See Travler's post below. Just because some silly blogger picked and chose titles that made the PS3 come o...
What the hel kind of crack are you guys smoking? The 360 is "running out of games"? The 360 had 46 games in 2008 that scored over 80, whereas the ps3 had 43. http://www.metacritic.com/g... http://www.metacritic.com/g... The 360 had more good games in 2008 than the ps3.
Anyway...Gears 2, Fable 2, and Left 4 De...
Says the guy with the Fallout 3 for PS3 avatar. I swear, I couldn't believe how much worse that game looked on the PS3 than the 360. I am glad for the comparison videos cause I almost considered getting it for the PS3. If that is the only system you got, then that is all you got, but I would never willingly choose to get it for that system. There are jaggies everywhere, the LOD sucks and there was way more slowdown.
That may be true but it is plainly obvious that this site is dominated by ps3 fanboys. they post the majority of the articles and they outnumber the xbox guys 4 to 1 or thereabouts. Also you will notice that all the pro ps3 people tend to have more bubbles than the 360 guys. I have seen people that are ps3 fanboys to the max and post nothing but negative comments about the 360 and they still have lots of bubbles. There is no doubt that it is totally slanted in favor of the Ps3.
Maybe, maybe not. But it is no different than what Sony did last generation with the Ps2. those things were dropping like flies and Sony denied it all until they got their asses slapped with a class action lawsuit.
You pulled those numbers out of your arse didn't you?
Where's the sources backing up your claim?