I love Pilot Wings, but using it as an example of a game with meat on it is laughable. They've always been glorified tech demos for their respective systems, more or less.
No, they spaced out BOTW and Odyysey perfectly. They needed two heavy hitters out of the gate to get rid of the black cloud known as the Wii U, from above their head. The problem is the lack of heavy hitters, and their respective spacing, this year.
By all means considering it's mission statement and use of an existing engine, Smash Bros Ultimate could have launched early this year no problem, for instance. Prime 4 could have been a summer release, and then Let's ...
Might want to learn the difference between a takedown notice, and a cease and desist, first.
Yeah okay, you tell yourself that. Try imagining where the Switch would be right now without BOTW, for instance.
The launch lineup's success sets the precedent for whether or not developers who were on the fence support it or not.
It will be a big thing, but it's not the NEXT big thing. I'd check back in 50 years when the means to actually do it efficiently are there.
I'm pretty sure Nintendo can be the providers, judging by what they've created over the past couple decades.
Well then thank god we go by what we play, and not what you see.
They indeed are. In general I've found that the only people who disagree are those who haven't played all the generations.
Gen.4 is where the series staleness really started showing. Fortunately gen.5 addressed that.
If people didn't have a switch until just now, how are they fanboys?
It's almost like people can have a different opinion from yours on it!
Claims there no game to play - Immediately lists games coming out and then disregards their existence because they don't appeal to them.
You a paid shill or what? You can't seriously believe that outright rip off of pokemon that looks like a heartless mobile game, looks better than Let's Go.(and I say that as someone who isn't impressed with Let's Go)
Wow, so much BS in such a short comment, truly an achievement. Firstly, all 3D is fake, and arguably the 3DS's was more real than ones that make you use glasses. Secondly, it wasn't "awful", it worked as it was described to. Thirdly, it wasn't damaging to eyesight, go try and find proof that it did and get back to me. And fourthly, no it didn't ruin the system, it just didn't add much to it. Didn't change that the 3ds went on to become one of the most success...
I mean, the article words it as if it were a mistake, but it's part of what made Kingdom Hearts the unique franchise that it is.
@The 10th Rider Sales has nothing to do with ambitiousness.
Even if it did, both KH and FF also do remarkable overseas, thus nullifying what little point you had.
That game is probably less than half as ambitious than either of these two, so it's a pointless comparison.
Not really. They were at the time, one of the best teams money could buy. Unfortunately between key employees leaving and Microsoft's general ineptness at directing a game division, it didn't work out at all.
The ironic thing is they did the anime style with Vesperia, better than almost anyone else at the time. But then they just ditched the style for future entries for no reason.
Vesperia isn't the best one, it's simply the last GOOD one made. Symphonia and Abyss are both better than it, but all three have their pros/cons.
Which is more than we can say about your riveting commentary on the matter.