All Channels
Popular

JEECE

Contributor
CRank: 5Score: 138680

Yes, this game will sell millions of copies due to the Star Wars name and because many people (the types who buy a few games per year and don't pay attention to sites like N4G) won't have any idea about the issues with the game. However, EA's sales expectations for this game are going to be ridiculously high, so people who are knowledgeable and unwilling to accept pay-to-win can hurt this game and EA if we actually don't buy it. No, we won't be able to make it completely...

3141d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Notice how no one is advocating that philosophy. No one defends pay-to-win micro-transactions.

3141d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I'd say they're only acceptable when the items have no impact on gameplay (i.e. rocket League, Overwatch).

3141d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

@Many-hat5

Why is that inevitable? Overwatch uses only cosmetic items in its crate system, and it is wildly successful. Why should I assume that devs will automatically shift to a model that is obviously going to generate a ton of negativity towards their game? In two years, when looking at the success of overwatch versus Battlefront 2, which do you think devs will want to emulate?

3141d ago 3 agree4 disagreeView comment

I don't think I've ever seen someone defend lootboxes that offer a competitive advantage in multiplayer. What I have seen is people defend lootboxes that only contain cosmetic items, especially if that system replaces paying for maps as DLC.

3141d ago 7 agree1 disagreeView comment

UCForce, I'm pretty sure this Artemidorus person is a troll/joke account mocking people in their 50s/60s. Almost every one of his/her posts is totally disjointed and then ends with some non sequitur about how millennials are at fault for whatever thing he/she is complaining about. Once you realize he/she is joking, it's actually pretty funny.

3147d ago 7 agree1 disagreeView comment

I think it's more that it's $500 for the same library of games, rather than $500 for a console starting a new gen. Agree with you that people are totally hypocritical on price in comparison to phones, though.

3147d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

Now we know you are a knowledgeable, hardcore gamer, because you criticized Skyrim.

3148d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

@SurgicalMenace

"So how much are you guys willing to spend to convince yourselves the Swith is a justified purchase?"

addicted's initial comment implies that he/she plans to buy games without this download issue, so actual ownership of the console is a moot point.

3148d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

"What does bother me is buying a physical copy of a game and not having the entire game on said physical copy."

Do you have a PS4 or Xbox One? Because virtually every major game has significant update data, usually from day one, which is required to even get the true single player experience. So the whole doom and gloom "my single player game won't work in the future if servers are taken down" is pretty much true there too. If you want to play Witc...

3148d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I guess I find it to be a weird principle. At least partial game installations have been the norm on consoles for over a decade. I highly doubt you are actually going to maintain this position if you intend to really play a lot of Switch games.

3148d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Have fun not playing many games on the Switch. Micro SD cards aren't that expensive.

3148d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

Sounds like an improvement at least, but it's a long way from the "items in loot crates are aesthetic only" solution I was hoping for.

3149d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

People who "worship" the Metal Gear franchise won't be touching this game.

3151d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

Maybe horror games just make more sense for indie devs at this point.

3155d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

@Chocoburger

It sounds like you just don't like RPGs. As you noted yourself, grinding has been a part of JRPGs forever, even back in the glorious 1990s when everything was wonderful. Why is it okay for JRPGs to have level-grinding, but it isn't for western games? While I agree with you that the 12-25 hour game experiences are more fun, my opinion isn't fact. Some people like to grind through random encounters over and over to level up and get new gear. I fa...

3157d ago 5 agree1 disagreeView comment

My thoughts exactly. I've never been tempted to buy a lootbox using real $ in any game. I'd much rather have them in a game than have to pay for maps.

3157d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

Even if single-player games are dying (which I take no stance on), one upcoming game hardly disproves a trend. Besides, anyone seriously making this argument would almost certainly be arguing it in terms of PS4/Xbox One, not the Switch.

3163d ago 7 agree1 disagreeView comment

I've never seen a game get so much attention for being unpopular.

3188d ago 6 agree0 disagreeView comment

Try harder man. People were saying this about Macs before smartphones even existed. Samsung took an established sentiment and used it in mass marketing.

3193d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment