Lol we all know how well Xbox owners support Japanese games. Steam I could see, though.
P5: Golden on Switch?
@JackTheLiz
A surprising number of people who have only passing knowledge of the video game industry don't even know about the Wii U, or don't understand the difference between that and the Wii.
I hope they don't do some comically large XL redesign that looks like a Fisher Price toy. Although it would actually be funny to see if people would buy into that again.
Unreal Tournament 3 on PS3 was so much fun.
@Prubar
As I said, I like that sort of DLC as an overall strategy because it is better for the game's community. I'm saying that on an individual level, I can't see why a person would spend real money on cosmetic items (except maybe to encourage devs to go this route). I'm glad people do, though.
Yeah, I wonder how long it is going to take for all the major games to get on this path. I don't really understand why this works (it makes no sense at all to me to pay real money for an in game item that doesn't impact gameplay) but I'm glad it does because I want free maps in games.
Cloud save.
GameCube VC please! And maybe a Definitive Version of Mario Maker?
The Switch feels like a premium device though, while the Wii U felt like a Fisher price toy.
Such an underrated studio. Maybe a new IP will help them gain traction outside the Sony hardcore, much like Horizon has done for Guerrilla. I will miss Infamous though, and would like to see them go back at some point (a la Naughty Dog going back for UC4 after TLOU).
I seem to be the only one who thinks this, but I enjoyed 4 more than 3. 3 had a better story, but 4 ran so much better (PS4 compared to PS3, I realize PC is different). Also, 4 just felt way more open. 3 had an "open" map, but it felt really restricted with all the walls of debris blocking things off and funneling you.
I love all the people who say they don't buy digital because they think they won't be able to play the digital versions of their games in 5-10 years. Guess what? If Sony/Microsoft cuts off digital services, even if you reinstall your physical games, you won't be able to download patches, so you'll be playing almost all of them in a broken state unlike what you remember, especially big RPGs.
Yeah, there was so much outcry when Homefront came out, a game about North Koreans taking over the US. I also remember how upset everyone was about MGS: Peace Walker because you fought for the left-wing, Soviet-backed Sandinistas against the CIA.
My thoughts exactly. In three years this game will still be labeled early access and this crowd will move on to another fad genre that will have a bunch of games that never leave early access.
So basically never, since these types of games stay in early access until people forget about them and their fad genre has died down.
Sorry physical media people. You use obsolete tech, and it's dying whether you like it or not.
Yeah I was assuming no physical media, but I feel like the people who would care would mostly be people buying digital anyway. And yeah, the price of flash memory would need to come down enough that they could put 512gb or so in there.
Obviously they'd have to figure out the controls (unless they went the tablet+controller route), but what would be awesome is if Sony came out with a portable PS4 as the next handheld. This obviously assumes mobile tech will continue to get cheaper and more efficient, making this a viable option. But it would be great, as it would have an established library, and people would already own a ton of games.
I'd be happy to see it on Vita, but I just don't see that as likely. Who knows, though, as some Japanese companies seem to understand that the Vita audience is small but hardcore.