Unfortunately the type of SP-loving people who comment on here are not representative of the consumer at large. While Bethesda keeps kicking out awesome single player experiences, the vast majority of average Playstation/Xbox owners are totally unaware of their output other than Elder Scrolls/Fallout. Bethesda puts out awesome non-annualized games in the Dishonored or Wolfenstein series and those games get demolished in sales by games we consistently complain about like Assassin's Creed...
Lol the people who bash NMS but continue to try to defend Star Citizen are the best. It's like criticizing the guy who got distracted by a phone call and accidentally walked out of the store without paying for a bottle of coke and defending the gang of criminals who carried out a coordinated robbery of a diamond store.
My dream is that Sony's next handheld is just a portable PS4. Everyone would already have a huge library, and devs would already know what to do. I get that there are technical issues with that concept, and that Nintendo beat them to the punch, but still.
Mass Effect is and always has been mediocre, and Andromeda is just when people admitted it to themselves.
Exactly. The people who are so upset about accounts are the people who spend tons of money on MTs.
A Kotaku writer pining for Xbox's golden years. I'm guessing there will be some good comments here.
Lol I love how people are pretending to be upset about loot boxes while they act equally as mad at Sony that they can't use all the MTs they bought in fortnite when they play on the switch. If I'm an exec seeing how much people get mad about not being able to play with dumb cosmetics they bought with real money, I'd be jamming them into every possible game.
What I'm saying is that like 3% of the people mad about the changes to battlefield are primarily mad about women being in the game, but by packaging the addition of playable women with all the changes people are actually mad about, EA can pretend like the people with legitimate criticisms are just "trolls mad about girls being included."
But yeah the minority actually mad just about female characters are dumb.
I like that they introduced a bunch of annoying garbage like face paint designed to sell skins/MTs alongside of introducing playable female characters, so that whenever people complain about the changes obviously focused on selling MTs, they can say "You just HATE women!" "You're a terrible MRA sexist troll!". I'm actually not being sarcastic-this was a really nice marketing move, because they had to know there was going to be backlash on the aesthetic stuff, and ...
I can't believe people are this mad because they can't have their special hat or fly with their special umbrella when they play on Switch. It doesn't change the game at all. No wonder these companies are always trying to take advantage of us with microtransactions.
It's horrifying to me how many people apparently think this mediocre 4-map remake was good; I assume they never actually played BF1942.
Because he never played bf1942 to know that this is a garbage remake.
No. It is a bastardization of BF1942. Limits the class system and cuts out most of the best maps. One of the worst battlefield games.
Lol there was an "MGS4 is coming to 360" article like every few weeks at one point.
You have to remember though that a lot of the crowd from that time is gone; even if a lot of these people on here now participated in the last gen, it was probably later after things had balanced out a lot (I tend to think of Uncharted 2 as one of the markers of that, but that isn't scientific).
What I'm getting at is that people don't remember the an...
I bet a millennial made it.
@PUBG
When I said "true WWII Battlefield" I was intentionally excluding BF1943. This was not a true iteration of the series, it was a remake of only a handful of BF1942's maps (and only Pacific theater ones for some reason) and it also limited the class system compared to BF1942.
Even counting that, considering it came out with BFBC2, there have been 3 modern Battlefields during that time, and none of them were 4-map multiplayer-only rema...
There were four modern BF games between 2008 and 2013 (BFBC, BFBC2, BF3, BF4). BF4 still has an active player base on current gen consoles and PC. There hasn't been a true WWII battlefield since 2002. How does a modern setting make sense?
BF1942 was long enough ago that (unfortunately) most people playing now never played it. BF1943 was just a weak remaster of a few maps from 1942, and hardly a true iteration of the series.
I don't understand all the shock that this isn't a modern setting. Battlefield Bad Company 1 & 2, and Battlefield 3 & 4 were all modern military shooters. Four games since 2008. There hasn't been a proper WWII battlefield since 2002 (I don't count BF1943 as a true iteration of the series as it was only a few maps), and most people playing now never played that one, and even those that did can recognize that the engine has changed significantly enough that a revisit to...
Metal Gear Solid 4.