And they typically list the same games. It's just getting old by now.
The initial SF games have all typically been great, but the revisions always improved upon them. Nearly everything in that list is to my liking, particularly with respect to Guile gaining the Sonic Hurricane...he really needs a decent Super/Ultra.
I'm a first day buyer if this all rings true.
A new Wii so early would be suicide on Nintendo's part. With the original achieving such good market penetration and still a popular product, what are developers supposed to do? Create HD versions of current and future Wii games? Not likely.
The next Nintendo machine won't be ready until it's ready. Far too many "experts" and analysts keep coming to their conclusions as if this is the PC market. It isn't, and it won't be, ever.
For the motion argument, I'm ...
Games are taking way longer to produce these days, not to mention higher costs and larger teams in today's volatile market.
Even though we're 4 years deep, this generation still seems like it's in its infant stages IMO. It just hasn't had the impact on me at this point that other generations did at similar stages in their life.
I'm betting on 2015 at the earliest. If a blockbuster game starts production tomorrow, it won't be out for another 2-3 years. This isn't the ...
This is an internet list, not too much different from those that came before it or those that will inevitably come after.
We're not dealing with an engrossing plot here.
Let's face it, UE3 blew most everyone away when it was first revealed.
I remember being in awe when I saw the first screen of UT3 on the cover of a magazine. I was in disbelief.
Of course, the shortcoming came to light shortly thereafter, but it still stands that many folks were colored impressed upon release.
My main concern is whether or not they will be able to make up for all of the areas that UE3 was lacking in.
The man is a completely wooden actor, I liken him to Keanu Reeves. Make no mistake about it, these two gentlemen somehow manage to land roles in some pretty spectacular features, but they themselves are average actors at best IMO. I would much rather see an actor that can portray the type of edgy persona that defines Snake. Jason Statham would be a better pick, but not quite.
They said this about MK4....and it was garbage.
Also said it about Deadly Alliance...also garbage...
Let's see if third time is the charm.
where people are politically radical, extremely violent, militant and yet extremely dependable as well. It was the murder capital of the world some years ago, and being a tropical island, it would make for some beautiful locales, as well as depicting the gritty, poverty-stricken slums peppered throughout the island.
Moscow would be my second choice, while Vegas and London are too cliche, and Alabama just doesn't interest me at all.
but it's called "NFL", or I give you backbreaker, are you still gonna pick that official NFL game before a BETTER GAME with no-names?
It's crazy how so many people have become commercialized zombies.
where a "performance analysis" decides whether or not we're going to exhaust a machine. Nevermind getting into detail about how intensive, specific, or taxing this analysis was...it was analysis done by Crytek, so we ought to take that as the law.
As with anything else, I'll believe it when I see it.
Amen to that.
I think blogs of all types should be banned from this site. They really are much worse than forum posts, for how deceptive they are if nothing else. Far too many people look at every blog as some sort of official source, when in reality a brain-dead pre-teen could run a blog. That's all they literally are anyway...a web log of whatever asinine thoughts the blogger wants to dump into it.
Not to defend forum posts, but at least with those there's no mista...
Somebody oughta change that portion of the title to "speculation", and since it has no factual basis, drop the overzealous "MAJOR" part of it too. Let's also not forget that this has been speculated upon...scores of times before hand, so this...guess is nothing new or enlightening.
MGS1 - Fair. Played it last year, still a gem. The limiting factors of the gameplay are part of what makes it so compelling.
MGS2 - Underrated, and criminally so. Most people seem to bash the game simply because Raiden was the main and not Snake. That's complete BS. This game outclassed the first one in every conceivable way, from characters, gameplay to storytelling, cutscenes, the whole nine yards. Amazing game.
MGS3 - Fair. Best of the bunch by a long shot. So man...
completely pulled me away from Killzone 2. Killzone is just godly, but the unadulterated fun factor and satisfaction I get with Street Fighter is just second to none. SF4 is not perfect by any stretch...and it annoys me pretty thoroughly at times, but it's about as fun as it gets.
Same video is also on IGN. I had problems with this source as well, the video quit playing outright at around 1:20.
They're better off investing that money, time, and energy into another game or bug fixes.
who knows, but Guerrilla really did a bang-up job with this game.
Ultimately it's a matter of judging a product before it's released, yet not adhering to that in the case of other games.
Reputation also means squat. Some Mario games have been garbage, many would say that the first Killzone fell into that league, and quite a few within the Halo community would tell you that neither sequel lived up to the original.
Besides that, I wasn't just referring to licensed IPs, notice how I mentioned Kane and Lynch and Tony Hawk as well.
This franchise died a while ago. These games have been the same since 2K7, fundamentally. An engine rewrite is a must, and I don't even wanna touch the issue of annual rehashes.
Sadly, until the market responds in kind, sports games will never see the kind of production value and attention to detail that they need and deserve. I pray for the day that a developer like Polyphony digital gears up and crafts a true basketball sim, working on the game for as long as it takes to ensure...