3DS XL: a luxury or an insult to Nintendo fans?
Like shut the heck up already.
Lmao!
The 360 came in 3rd place (Wii, PS3, 360), as it managed to lose it's 2nd place position to the PS3. Not to mention that it was only good for FPS and Racers. That doesn't sound like king to me; that sounds like a VERY selective market. Why do you think it did so horribly outside of the UK and NA?
@ Muzikguy
When compared to the PS4, the XB1 is about $15 more. Which means at $400, Microsoft was just breaking even on the console if not losing a few dollars. At $350, Sony is making a profit off the PS4. Microsoft undercut them $50, putting the XB1 at $300. If they were already breaking even at $15 more than the PS4, then certainly $50 cheaper than PS4's $350 price must have set them back by $65 as loss on the console. If they bundle two games, one of those games ...
Of course they denied this garbage. This was a bunch of hot air hype to keep fans from leaving or getting angry at their missteps. I told you, Microsoft was desperate. How is your biggest announcement regarding your LEADING competition helping you out of your grave? By them merging their servers with Microsoft would benefit them more than Sony.
I didn't see Microsoft doing any of this when they were leading with the 360. But of course, the fans didn't want yo hear that.
@ Dopetech
The PlayStation 4 Neo is twice as powerful as the PS4. The PS4 is 50% as powerful as the Xbox One. If the XB1 is to be more powerful than the Neo, it has to be 250% more powerful, which is going to lead to cost issues. If Microsoft's XB1 had trouble breaking even when compared to the PS4 ( https://technology.ihs.com/... ), it'll either be more expensive or weaker than the Ne...
Never understood why they never did this before when they held the rights to the franchise
Sony has been ahead of MS practically this entire race. Every time MS did something, Sony either already did it or they weren't too far behind in doing it themselves. My guess is by the time MS gets around to matching this Neo console, Sony would have moved on to something else. All MS seems to have at this point are costly price drops.
@ relax
Yeah, you so did your research on that because blind people can also use the console without VR. I Bet you were top of your class. LoL
.....or you can just get a VR headset at a fraction of the cost and do the same thing.
Yet another ps4 exclusive. Told you their 1st and 2nd party was a beast.
So let's recap:
January - The Witness
February - Street Fighter 5
March - MLB The Show 2016
April - Rachet & Clank
Next up....
May - Uncharted 4
June - No Man's Sky
Dreams, Ni Oh, The Last Guardian, Playstation VR alone with many others are still on the way this year.
'You ...
Hololens is all hype. Why do you think Microsoft isn't releasing it to consumers? AR at its current stage, is not ready. Its twitchy and there are only so many games you can implement it into before you get a repetitive.
Ok, but what about the NOW? What do you have for the console NOW? I don't want to hear about speculation regarding how great the distant future is. That's like me saying flying cars will be a game changer, but how does that help the situation NOW? If you don't have anything for us to get our hands on, then all the hype about what's to come in the distant future is pointless.
@ kribwalker
So you think the 360, that is ONLY selling well in NA and the UK, is still beating out the PS3, that happens is selling better every place else on the globe?
Riddle me this Einstein... The 360 originally started with a 5 million lead over the PS3 by the time it launched the market. In the first 2 years, that lead increased to 8 million in the favor of the Xbox 360. During this entire time, the PS3 was outselling the 360 on a GLOBAL scale. So alt...
You haven't tried it, rookie. Stop lying.
@ death
Are you listening to yourself? You can't use the Move without the camera neither, but that doesn't mean the Move cost $75. What part of that don't you understand? You say Sony listed the $400 price of VR to make it seem cheaper than it is, when actually it is that cheap as it is just another piece of the puzzle if you decide to upgrade from the camera. Its the same for the Move.
Because the camera is a multi-functional device, you don'...
@ death
Again...... if you have a PS4 and you wanted a mic to go online with, that is $45 BECAUSE you wanted to talk to other online users. You don't include no dang PSVR in this due to the camera already acting as a standalone device all on it's own. The same applies if you only wanted to put videos on YouTube from your PS4 or wanted to stream yourself on Twitch. You don't need a VR headset to do this. You just need the camera.
If you are using t...
@ death
BS! Unlike the Rift or Vive sensors, the PlayStation camera can be used for multiple other things such as voice chat, voice commands, Twitch & Ustream, and even select Move & DualShock 4 titles -- Until Dawn and Just Dance being a couple off the top if my head. Are we suppose to factor in VR if we happen to use the camera in this type of manner, too? While we're at it, we might as well say the Move controller really cost $80 or the DS4 $115 since they use ...
@ Trauma
That sounds like Gear VR. There is a reason the others have higher specs and ergonomics; they are designed for longer play time and usage.
It is most definitely the future of entertainment. Those who haven't tried it are the only ones that think this.
We also get share play, wellard