4K is dubbed 4K because it is 4 times the resolution of 1080p.
Prey did get pro enhancements, but that was weeks after launch despite the box having the logo. Return to Arkham also had enhancements but they are so basic and unimportant it’s not even wort mentioning. It’s basicallt just framerate boost and even that framerate boost is not significant enough to be noteworthy. Note: Return To Arkham also didn’t have a pro patch right at launch like prey. IT Took time
No. No matter how you slice it, Mario is a more accessible game franchise that is much Moreno communicable and easy to pick up for casual gamers and non-gamers. THe games are designed for everyone. Zelda games have much more complicated mechanics and require more dedication. Zelda will never be as mainstream as Mario.
The babies didn’t approve of my comment on their site. How cute
The low specs aren’t difficult to imagine. It had to run on both a ps4 and Xbox One, after all....which aren’t new hardware in the slightest
Double Agent was good and so was Blacklist. And yes. Blacklist had its issues and those forced first person shooter segments were completely out of place, but on the whole, it was a good stealth game. Not as egregiously offensive as the one before it whose name escapes me because it was so forgettable.
Higher quality assets and less compression take up more space.
I have a 2TB drive and that's too small for me. I don't know how you live with 500GB. I own 103-106 physical ps4 games and that combined with some Digital games and the free ps plus games....500GB is literally chump change. Completely useless
Well that's you. I am passionate about the industry as a whole and that includes things like this random trivia that have no impact directly on us as gamers, but it's still something interesting to people like me because we care about gaming as an industry and not just a way to have fun.
If you as a gamer, don't find random tidbits like this interesting or newsworthy, then you are probably not as passionate about the video game industry as a whole as some other people here. This is most definitely news.
By accepting the very existence of microtransactions in a single player game you are in fact enabling the publisher to go down the slippery slope and see how far they can push it in future title before there is significant pushback from the audience. If you don't take a stand now, things will only get worse. Just look at this gen's business practices compared to last gen. It keeps going downhill because people keep dismissing things that are "minor" and then the devs accept ...
Sounds like you enjoy bending over for EA
Uh...basically every Sony first party title is a single player focused game and Nintendo has a decent mix of single player and multiplayer experiences
Uh have you ever thought to consider that there are passionate gamers out there that find the technology that powers our games interesting and genuinely enjoys comparisons of the same game across multiple platforms??? I would spend hours at night watching random comparisons of games I never was going to get or games that were monumentally better on PC and I don't game on PC. Doesn't stop comparisons from being interesting.
Yes it does. The Evil Within 2 is far from the most beautiful game ever created. There is always room for video games to look better. Always. No reason not to make a game look better when better hardware is available.
....with the ease of digital distribution in the modern era and the industry making more money than it ever has, more and more people have had opportunities to make games than would have been possible last gen. The market is absolutely over saturated with releases. This gen is the first gen I have been legit overwhelmed with how many games are constantly coming out that I want. It's impossible to play it all
Games do this because publishers are greedy. The industry now is so much larger than it was 10-15 years ago. So many more people play video games now than last gen and each year, the amount of people gaming will only continue to grow, increasing the potential audiemce. It's all the big already wealthy publishers that use microtransactions and dlc in such egregious ways. Smaller studios, like obscure Japanese devs, are the ones that don't make much money and yet their games as a whole ...
@spenok, yes it did because if you bought the game used and then did not pay for the online pass, that publisher literally got $0 from you as a consumer
Uh...what are you talking about? The online passes as in those codes that came with games that you needed to input just to access online features, otherwise you would have to pay for the pass online if you bought it used. Those died off because nobody supported games that included them. Either by not buying the game or continuing to buy used and bam. The online pass disappeared. If you don't make a stand against these publishers then games will only be invaded with more and more anti-cons...
Then explain that Doom has a confirmed Xbox One X patch whereas the pro never got any such announcement???? It’s clear by the end of this generation, the Xbox One X will either equal or surpass the total amount of supported games when you already have games confirmed for a One X patch that have been out for over a year with the Pro’s existence with still no pro patch