Not a single person said that ALL PS3 exclusives are amazing. You just picked an opportunity to take a jab at the console, which is why your bubbles are in the condition they're in now (despite your questionable claims of PS3-ownership).
OT: While I liked the idea behind ModNation Racers, it still lacked that final touch that no kart racing game has had since MK64 (for me). Still, if Sony is taking another shot at the genre, I'm intrigued!
You'll find some more concerned with battling over their preferred company's sales / profits before worrying about games (you know, what's most important for any video game console).
Just the nature of freedom of speech in the information era.
I'd actually like to know who said more exclusives = more sales per title. And only one of the two 360 exclusives you mentioned in the Top 20 isn't a pack-in title (Gears of War 3).
Frankly, I'd prefer to play the many (core) exclusives offered, rather than trying to 1-up forum goers on meaningless debates - or bragging about who's exclusives sold more, as you gain zilch from such a victory.
Your rant about Naughty Dog and Sony "tacking" things on is just ridiculous, given that many devs have said that Sony gives them nothing but freedom. Also, online =/= multi-player, they could easily do some leader board component and call it a day. We already know there will be no co-op and they've said before it's a single player-only experience. Don't see that changing much.
Looking forward to hearing more.
They've said from the beginning it's single player only. This article just reaffirms it.
Did you not read the article?
Uh, not sure where I've spread one lie nor pretended to work for Sony. I believe you must have quoted the wrong person.
The problem with any of your posts, especially regarding anything Sony related, is that they're usually flamebait, trolling, or just plain false. When all three companies have boasted about stuff and you choose to pick just one of them to call out, it easily shows a clear bias and agenda.
Why take the one bit out of an already posted article and turn it into another article? And he said if there isn't any restructuring, they could face trouble.
Seems more mountain-out-of-mole-hill than anything else.
You are sadly misinformed and clearly on an agenda. No need to continue a debate.
Same feeling here! Very few TVs / devices have the picture quality of this Display.
$299-$399 for a game, 3D glasses, HDMI cable, 24' / 240hz 3D Display? Nah, definitely not a rip. $499, maybe. Lets also remember this thing does stuff no other device on the market does thus far.
$299-$399? Hardly.
I do. Two, in fact.
Why does it need to be multi-platform to be enjoyed? Like any other exclusive (if it ends up being an exclusive), you'll just have to buy what it's available on. If it comes out just for PS3 or Wii-U, that's what you'll have to buy.
My guess is that it will be multi anyway.
@ PersonMan: Uh, I said PRE-rendered. It's a no-brainer that they render everything on the engine, but he said they pre-rendered everything, which they do not.
Just so you know, Naughty Dog doesn't do pre-rendered stuff, but like most doubters, you are obviously misinformed.
Very much my thoughts since there was doubt after the initial trailer.
False. The only big regions the 360 outsells the PS3 are the UK and US. The "rest of the world" is in PS3's favor (when speaking strictly against the 360).