I think you're referring primarily to Ubisoft, whose 360>>>>PS3 ports have been a little rough around the edges. Otherwise, there are a number of ported titles out there which have often been described as equal to - or better - than the 360 original (Fight Night Round 3, Oblivion, etc.)
And judging from what I've been hearing about PS3's version of Vegas, it sounds like Ubisoft does indeed have the ability to release good quality ports.
and it really doesn't look that bad so far...with the exception of some inexcusable stuttering/chopiness during some cutscenes, and muddy-like water (which makes it very difficult to see/navigate through.)
Otherwise, the in-game graphics generally look a lot nicer than they're perceived to be...perhaps not 'DA 360' quality, but not too shabby nonetheless.
One other thing I feel I should advise: The load times are just atrocious...even the routine and obligatory...
I don't think the author's using the term 'aging' in the traditional sense of the word.
what I 'think' he's referring to is the ability of the PS3 to RENDER/ALTER complex sceneries/textures/lighting in real-time - that is, without having to render frame-by-frame as with traditional CGI (i.e., Toy Story/Shrek, etc.)
This is what I think they are referring to as '4D'; we've always been able to render complex 3D sceneries...except that doing so is painfully slow: O...
Fly by night.
Great deal for those of us who are still shopping around for a headset.
Personally, I've seen much worse.
That's not nearly as long as Duke Nukem Forever!!
Ha!...Gotchya there!
(Oh, how I wish I was only kidding.)
Could this be the mysterious Walmart HD player everyone was arguing about???
It's sooo about time!
(nearly six months of delays!!!)
By all means feel free to hit Disagree to your heart's content, but answer my friggin' question if you do so.
My statement was not an argument; it was a question.
@rjkc
I don't know. You tell me. That's what I want to know.
bombardment of absolutely non tech-related shows such as Star Trek, Cheaters(???), Arrested Development, Jamie Kennedy, Cops (now in 2.0!!!), and still declare themselves tech-driven.
Nightmares like this often occur when overly-authoritative, arrogant investors/owners/CEO's cluelessly try to run the show without seeking or acknowledging feedback from valid experts who are truly in the know.
And then, one day, the sh*t hits the fan, subordinate heads unjustifiabl...
if it's usually necessarily attributed to depression.
Despite my generally happy childhood, it was virtually impossible to pry me away from a console or arcade machine once I got my hands on it (or at least as long as the quarters lasted.)
Although I must admit that it could be deemed as a form of escape/procrastination/etc., it's always been quite simply one of those things that I've always simply loved and been attracted to...and probably will for the rest of m...
But things still get a little out of hand even for the Depends, following an evening at Taco Bell.
(Sorry...I couldn't resist.)
I see your point.
I guess we'll find out whether his opinion is genuine or not once E3 hits, and to what extent X-Play/G4 spins and showcases each company...unless of course, Sony does indeed fizzle like many believe they did last year...
But I have a gut feeling that this time, well, Things Will Be Different.
(...hey, where'd I head that before???) ;)
I have an honest, legitimate question:
Should blogs be deemed as newsworthy?
I'm always hesitant to approve such stories, because I have a hard time deciding whether they should be deemed a legitimate article or not.
If the majority believes that blogs are indeed worthy of publication, then so be it, and I'll proceed accordingly.
One thing that is interesting though, is the enormous wave of opinion that Blu-Ray has officially won the...
Oh well, at least I haven't yet resorted to the demeaning 'slops bucket.'...
Nope...no need, because those trusty Depend adult diapers have been working just fine. ;)
1. You're speculating.
2. "You first Lie... mislead.. and then cover you @$$ for the bomb... in the mean time... people will buy your product... very smart Sony.. very smart."
The vague statement concerning the number of games was made on June 21st; today is June 22nd. If their intention is indeed as you claim, then how many units do you think they intended to sell before they dropped the proverbial bomb only twenty four hours later?
3...
Awww, man...
With that number decimated to only of a third of the anticipated 380 games, that's going to occupy only about three years of my life...if I play each and every one for one week, non-stop, back-to-back, without any pee-breaks.
Now what else shall occupy all that extra time???
Blasphemy, Sony...BLASPHEMY!!! ;)
It's funny, because I had the exact same impression you did; despite my enjoyment of watching X-Play (with its warped and twisted sense of humor) I realized that most anyone on G4TV in general, seldom has anything good to say about the PS3...
...and then I was taken aback last week, when upon surfing the X-Play section, I came across a video titled 'Adam's Assessment'...an interview-format blurb from Sessler, voicing his opinion about Sony's recent Gamer's Day, which surprisin...
how many anti-video-gaming proponents, such as Jack Thompson, irresponsibly spin vague and irrelevant events and statistics to support their questionable cause, yet have the balls to dismiss pro-gaming statistics such as these.
In reality, there probably ISN'T any correlation with video games and the decrease in crime rate...but when in Rome, do as the Romans do, right?
So be it, then: Wacko Jacko recklessly preaches that video games are the root of all evil??? ...