Gameplay is much tighter in the arkham games by design. They are much much harder to master, especially asylum, because they require the player to be much more precise.
Combat in spider-man is much more free flowing. I love it, but it is definetally looser. No doubt about it. Still tight though.
@TheKingKratos we are talking about asylum not knight. Get your games straight
Lol the idea that this was some hidden gem that "np one" found is hilarious. Everyone found this, no one cared, because it isn't actually an easter egg. It is just the camera spinning around. This naugthy dog animator probably feel like it is worth more attention because he worked on this segment and can't see the forest for the trees.
I 100% believe HeisenbergX here. I think this was even mentioned in most trophy guides even though it is not required for ...
It is i unlikely that reedus wont make himself availible to kojima as he has proffesed over and over again how much he love him and the creative process they have been through with this game.
@ShadowWolf712
You do realize that without said purchase of goods or service generating equal or more currency than what was spent in the creating or act of said good or service the model would not be viable?
Capitalism only works as long as revenue is generated.
You get it. But these people think games should be created for the good of mankind, with no consideration for why things are like they are.
Oh wow. So many replies, and you all are missing the point.
Selling a game for $60 is monetizing too. I know that is not what he meant, but that was the whole point.
You guys are acting like the very idea of monetization is evil, but how is an industry supposed to work without generating income.
Then you will say, they can monetize the initial purchase, but nothing beyond that. I say ok, that means less revenue, which leads to smaller ...
@Hedstrom
Well we are talking about the very core of the system.
I. E. It is appearantly disgusting to monetize people, but in that case everything is disgusting simply because to everything is monetized by monetizing people.
How do we create anything without considering how it will justify its existence by generating revenue.
I am probably more left leaning than most, but people are acting like video games, which is ...
Oh wow. General concepts of capitalism disgusts you?
I hate this debate because it is always made into a moral debate while ignoring any and all real world consequwnces of the society we live in.
Monetization should not be a thing? At all?
You do realize how little sense that makes?
How are developer supposed to make games if they cannot generate an income?
Convenience does not mean they are too lazy to put a disc in no. For one, that is not even the convenient part of it. Secondly just because someone choses a convenient option does not in any way mean they are too lazy to do chose the other option.
There is absolutely no logic in what you are saying. If you are presented with two options and one is more convenient than the other and you choose the convenient option, you are not lazy, you are smart. This spplies to you as wel...
I think it is extremely short sighted to blame the digital future on people being lazy. Ignorant even.
David Jaffe can be quite crass so people reacting to what he says is nothing new.
This article is a weird form of hit piece however. It doesn't even quote what he supposedly said. It tells us people are mad at him, and expects us to trust they are mad for the right reasons.
It is rather strange. I am sure whatever Jaffe said was crass and people probably had a reason to react. This article just didn't give me any insight into it at all.
Funny how that had no effect on the so called grind that people said was put there to entice mts, despite the fact that mts had no effect on the grind at all.
I am not sure if this is what AK91 is alluding to but here is the famous Phil Spencer Quote on single player games.
"The audience for those big story-driven games... I won’t say it isn’t as large, but they’re not as consistent. You’ll have things like Zelda or Horizon Zero Dawn that’ll come out, and they’ll do really well, but they don’t have the same impact that they used to have, because the big service-based games are capturing such a large amount of the audience. ...
Wow. Growngaming.com "Where grown-ups game on" but clearly children are writing the articles.
What a pointless piece. No exploration of the argument, simply put the writer wants games to be shorter because he has less time. Yea I haven't heard that one before. He even goes as far as to ask games to not engage in their core mechanics in case it forces him to play with the mechanics a little bit to finish the game.
I am sorry, but Shadow of M...
I am sure there is a discussion to be had here, but this article comes off as being written by someone that has deemed religious thinking as worthwhile because he has personally found value in his own process. However just as we cant outright say that that value does not exist, he cannot say that the oposite is true simply because of his or her personal experience.
F. Ex. I am an atheist and see no value in having religious thought be presented as the deep meaningful intros...
So something in a trailer from a pre-release build did not make it into the game? That is what is considered lying?
I have read all the claims i have found about these supposed lies and most are incosequential or based on subjective perception of depth.
The game at launch was not a great game, but it was much closer to what the game was marketed as then what it is now.
What lies were those?
@L7CHAPEL
Well they are offering year 1 Destiny 2 for free now, that is of course part of what you bought. Vanilla Destiny + all year 1 expansions. Year 2 still needs to be purchased if you want to experience that content, but it is becoming optional with the release of the new expansion.
Meaning you can buy shadowkeep and still experience everything without even playing forsaken and all its season content. You will still potentially be losing out on cont...