Maybe my most anticipated game at the moment, though No Man's Sky and Tomorrow Children are up there as well. Battlefront next week though… :D
If that's so, why did Advanced Warfare on XB1 sell more than double what Titanfall and TMCC sold?
@Flex - "Yeah...if by 'a lot' you mean the millions of PS fans that cant play halo."
Advanced Warfare on XB1 doubled the sales of both Titanfall and TMCC. I expect BO3 on XB1 to outsell Halo 5 on XB1. Does that make it better? No, but it does mean that more XB1 gamers will play CoD than Halo. Since I also assume people play what they want to play, that means more will prefer CoD.
Going by Bethesda's history it will be buggy well after that.
OT - That depends on each person's level of hype and expectations, so who the hell knows? I personally don't expect much because I didn't enjoy Fallout 3 nearly as much as most people seemed to. Because of that, along with my personal experience with buying Bethesda games, I won't be trying this game out for quite awhile.
"You act like they won't fix stuff with a couple patches"
This is Bethesda we're talking about. I still can't cure my Skyrim character's Lycanthropy because of a bug...
I'll disagree with you because it's obvious when multi plat performance is compared that PS4 wins the vast majority of the time. =)
Comparing consoles makes perfect sense, but there is wider variation in PC performance at any given time than there is among consoles during a particular generation.
It makes no sense to say "Fallout 4 will run better on PC" when reality is that it will run better on a certain percentage of PCs. I don't know why this is so hard for you to understand...
"Just because it's a bethesda game doesn't mean it has to be riddled with stupid bugs"
If you look at their history, yeah it kinda does mean that. For some reason they've always had quality control problems and thus have never been able to shake the well deserved "Bugthesda" nickname.
You might as well make a list of games you don't like and try to get people not to buy them, so more games like them won't be made. That will impact your gaming world far more than a season pass for one game.
"Halo 5 hands down is the best shooter multiplayer this year."
vs
"Black Ops 3 beats Halo 5 in just about every area"
Both are high rated games, and people can legitimately think either one is better than the other. You're both wrong for thinking your opinions are fact.
I don't think there are but could be wrong. The interactive Endor trailer implied you might hear them or their drum beats or something… but it didn't imply you'd actually see them.
Thanks for the info!
Is this anything like Battleborn? They seem similar to me but maybe it's just the art style and various characters. This looks like the better of the two imo but I couldn't really say why I feel that way...
I bought it when the online stuff was still more miss than hit, and had a great time with it. There's lots of content to get through even offline. Even now I race mostly offline, but I'll see the ghosts of people on my friends list or other gamers involved with a challenge.
2 million sales is great for a new IP even if the launch is smooth.
You haven't played many racers then.
"This Game is so underrated"
Amen to that, and it's season pass is definitely worth buying too. Driveclub is the only game so far that I use with PS4's Event registration function. It's cool to get an alert on my phone that a Driveclub event is about to start.
"The point is, be consistent. Either it's ok to debate the merits of different gaming platforms or it's all subjective and pointless to discuss. You can't move the goalposts in an attempt to make it seem your favorite platform always comes out on top."
Gaming on PC is a moving goalpost itself because of all the possible hardware configurations. That's my main objection to comparing PC with consoles. It makes sense to compare consoles because hardware...
I'll need to demo the thing for myself first, but I'd go up to $399 with no problem if I really like the experience.
I can also see it being $399 and still not generating profit for Sony. I think a lot of people are being unrealistic about the price, if some of the comments I see on N4G are any indication. It's not going to be $199, no way, and I think $299 is unrealistic as well.
"third party games are developed with parity in mind"
Which makes PS4's multi plat performance advantage even more damning for XB1. It's easier to tell the difference between PS4 and XB1 multi plats than it was between 360 and PS3 multi plats, even on a lower res YouTube video.