His biggest complain is that you have to play the low difficulty modes first, and they're too easy. But strangely, he mentions hardcore mode briefly saying that it makes the low difficulty levels interesting, he says he will talk more about it later, but he never mentions this mode again.
It's like paitings and music CDs. Sometimes they only sell really well when the artist dies.
He talks about difficulty, but not even once he talks about hardcore mode. If it's so easy, can he manage to avoid death completely?
Great. The only other FF worse than XIII gets another sequel.
That's sad to know. I am actually waiting for a Steam promotion to buy it, because I know nothing about the developer and I'm not willing to pay 60 bucks. I was also set back when I heard that some people who made Elder Scrolls Oblivion also made this game. I hate Oblivion. After having a great time with Skyrim, I was afraid to buy KoA:R and see the same problems Oblivion had.
I think SNES was the first console to have shoulder buttons, so one more thing to add on your list.
@sikbeta
New stuff? Like what?
@PshycoNinja
It seems that the new trend in N4G is pointing at anyone and saying "you think your opinion is a fact". If you can't stand reading another person's opinions, what are you doing reading the comments? Read the article then close the page.
I wonder if these numbers consider those who got the game by buying WoW's annual pass.
EDIT: "The day one figure doesn’t include the 1.2 million people who signed up for the World of Warcraft Annual Pass"
Oops, read the article before posting a comment, stupid Nerdmaster...
I bought a PS3 to play Heavy Rain. Even if it was the only game I played on it, it would have been worth it.
Actually, you described practically every game on the App Store. They are exactly like that, you jump right in and start playing. If that's your kind of thing, you should get an iPhone.
I said just Diablo because it was the game that I was playing, and I already said the games I must play in 3D a few times here in N4G. But if you insist...
Racing games, Street Fighter IV, Resident Evil 5, Assassin's Creed, World of Warcraft, Diablo 3, Batman Arkham series, Witcher 2, Crysis, and the list goes on and on.
For me, arrogant is someone who acts like no one should give their opinions. That's what you're doing. You don't agree with ...
My point is that I just saw another proof of how amazing playing in 3D can be.
The difference between us is that I try something to say if it's good or bad. Your phrase, on the other hand, makes as much sense as saying "I tasted sugar, so salt is bad".
I just played two hours of Diablo 3 in 3D, so no, it's not a failure.
Oops, when posting another message above, I remembered about Alan Wake's first DLC. It was good. Didn't remember it because I played the PC version and the DLC came with the game. Well, now I remember one single good DLC.
That's the problem right there. People say that good DLC are those that expand the game, that are meaningful, that seem like expansion packs... But they don't want DLC that relates to the story, saying that it should be in the main game. How can a DLC be all the things you want if you don't want it to relate to the story?
I saw it happen to Alan Wake. I played the game, finished it, and it felt like an acceptable ending, horror movie-like. And then they released a...
In the beginning, I tought the DLC idea was great. Sadly, I can't remember a single DLC that was worth the price. In fact, I can't remember a single DLC that was that good, paid or free. The Portal 2 ones seem great, for those who like multiplayer and making stages. It's not my case, so...
I want this game, but I will only buy a PC version.
Since I bought NVidia's 3D Vision, there are certain games that I simply refuse to play in 2D. Racing games, Street Fighter IV, Resident Evil 5, Assassin's Creed, World of Warcraft, Diablo 3... Playing them in 2D is like closing one eye.
Says the person who never tried it.