correction - they havent shown YOU any other footage. they have shown plenty behind closed doors.
remember, Ubisoft alone were working on no less than 12 - yes, twelve - Natal games 6+ months ago. when Natal was first announced they said that there are between 70 and 80 percent of the video game industry publishers already on board making games for it.
expect all to be revealed at E3, release date and price too.
Move has momentum? first ive heard of this lol.
Microsoft have the 'wow' factor up their sleeve. Move is more accurate, move is more adaptable to current games, no doubt.......but Move is Wii 2.0.
NOONE has done full body 3D motion control like Natal. when people see it in action they pay attention. when people see Move in action they think 'oh yeah its like the wii'.
cue the angry sony fanboys disagrees.......
wow, so much wrong there i dont know where to start.....
ill give it a go though.
1. "IHYF, I dare you to find someone on N4G claiming AW is bad because of its resolution."
go read ANY of the 'alan wake is sub-720p' articles. there are literally dozens, if not hundreds, of sony fanboys in there claiming that exact thing.
2. i know resolution doesnt make or break a game. i never said it does.
...
so if halo 3 has 100ms, which is the quickest a 30fps game can possibly get, how do you suppose that a game that firstly uses a CAMERA and THEN has to add inputs in over the top of that, could somehow get less than 1 quarter of that lag?
just try and explain that. the PS Eye is laggy as all hell.
the PS3 version does not look better in any possible way. it has less detail, more texture pop-in, less self-shadowing, lower resolution, terrible anti-aliasing that blurs the entire screen, and worse LOD. it literally has nothing that looks better than the 360 version.
@PimpHandHappy: im sure it does look good on your PS3/Bravia............but it would look BETTER on your bravia running on a 360, guaranteed.
im pretty sure you missed something - RDR is being called one of, if not the best games of the generation. its gotten higher reviews from the big gaming publications than your beloved second coming of christ Uncharted 2, and if you took out all the 100%s/10 out of 10s/A+++s that the official sony sites/magazines gave Uncharted 2, RDR would be sitting higher on Metacritic too (as it is its only a single point behind, so it is clear it would be higher without all the fanboy sites giving U2 100/...
wow. as far as differences go, thats one of the most obvious ive ever seen.
the QAA really gives that Bioshock 'screen smeared with vaseline' effect, and quite frankly i cant understand why any developer would even use it over offering no AA at all.
glad i own both consoles, as ill be definitely picking up the superior 360 version after work tonight.
lol
by the time the next gen comes out there will be well over 100 million people with a previous gen xbox or playstation. there is a tonne of choice gameswise.
when the next gen comes out, anyone that buys them will only have a few games to choose from at launch. if one of those is yours and its semi-decent, it will sell absolutely gangbusters. resistance sold about 10x more than it wouldve had it launched 12 months later, simply because it was better than ...
so are you saying that Gears of War didnt 'pay out' for Microsoft? you remember Gears of War, dont you? the series with 2 games that have EACH sold more than ANY exclusive game on the PS3?
also, the timed exclusivity of the GTA DLC helped sales of GTA on the 360 and also made microsoft a metric $hitload of money, the timed exclusivity of Bioshock racked up huge sales and hype for the 360 (while the 12 month later PS3 version barely managed any) and the timed exclusivi...
look, the cold hard truth is that the PS3 will NOT be competitive with the next generation of consoles in ANY way other than price. people will buy it because its cheap and has a good and large back catalogue of games, like how people buy the PS2 now, but the next Xbox will absolutely dominate it where it counts - features, graphics, and 'next gen-ness'.
as good as some of you think the PS3s graphics are, the next xbox's graphics will make the PS3s graphics look l...
you can try and correct me 'again', but you havent corrected me once so you cant do it a second time ;)
Sony have lost market share. after 3 years of the PS2 and xbox being available, the PS2 had something like 75% market share.
after 3 years of both the PS3 and 360 being available, the PS3 has less than 50% market share.
there is no other way to look at it - they have lost market share. it doesnt matter how much the market has grown ...
the original xbox sold 30 million consoles. the 360 has sold over 40 million consoles and counting.
that means that sony have lost market share. do you even know what market share is? lol it doesnt sound like you do.
well it does have a few obvious negatives.
1. slower read speeds. this is the only reason why games have mandatory installs on the PS3. the ONLY reason. and dont give me the rubbish that its constant so its faster, its not. constant 9mb/s is not faster than 8-16mb/s variable.
2. cost. having the blu-ray drive in the PS3 added a few hundred dollars to the price. it also meant they couldnt drop the price for a very long time.
3. release date d...
lol
some of you people are so void of common sense its not funny.
the game is coming out on PS3. the video that this article has is an ad for the 360. why would microsoft pay for an ad for a game to then have PS3 on it? microsoft can advertise ANY game they want that is on their console. COD sells gangbusters, so they advertise it. Activision are happy because they dont have to spend money on the ad, microsoft are happy because people see the ad and see that ...
theyre not on the PS3 or Wii so theyre exclusive to the 360.
anyone that says otherwise is a fanboy.
crackdown?
perfect dark HD?
splinter cell conviction?
alan wake?
youre not counting them why exactly?
and GOW Collection isnt an AAA PS3 release, its 2 PS2 games upscaled.
lol
forza 3s paint jobs also reflect the surroundings, even the paint on the mirrors. but sure, whatever, its only good when Polyphony do it.......
id like to see some non-bullshot screens of GT5, ive had enough of these like 5000x4000 renders downsized to make them look like in-game screens. like naughty dog it looks like theyre not going to release a single actual native resolution in-game screenshot before the games release, which is very disappointing an...
every company release 'shipped' figures as they literally have NO way of knowing how many are actually sold on to the consumer. that fact alone is why things like NPD figures get released. think about it - if companies new how many copies of their games were sold, they would tell us directly. they wouldnt wait until the NPDs come out and then gloat/damage control.
the friends list stuff doesnt need to be slower because there is more info. when i view my friends gamer cards on 360 it loads faster than the PS3s one, even though the 360s one has far more information. optimisation is the key.
in a way i do want the XMB to be more like the NXE - i want it to be functional, aesthetically pleasing, and easy to use. like the NXE.
the PSEye cannot do what Natal does though.
PSEye does 2D motion recognition, Natal does 3D motion tracking.
PSEye is a 2D camera. it can NEVER do 3D motion tracking. if you move backwards the PSEye has no idea that you moved backwards. all it does is take 1 frame and compare it to the next and scan for changes in the picture. its like taking 2 screenshots of a game, 1 frame apart, and pointing out the changes.
Natal on the other hand finds y...