aren't articles like this just advertising the pirate versions?
i mean i know there are people who would have been looking for the pirate version anyway, but i bet there are a few people who decided to download the pirate version after reading an article like this.
"Some reviewers do not appear to know what objectiveness is though. No, they take this opportunity to attract hits on their petty sites"
ironic much?
he seems to be under the misconception that his opinion = fact.
everybody who agrees with him is right and everybody else is wrong?
and should we trust anything from a site that hosts a guide and tools for hacking xbox games?
fuck you mrmouse.
one thing i found pretty interesting in the comic was that the decision to save the rachni queen or not seems to have been important enough to have featured.
i'm guessing the rachni could end up being an ally against the reapers in mass effect 3, assuming you let the queen live.
they attacked the cia, after publicly announcing they would attack the cia.
i'd say they're pretty fucking stupid.
is anybody really surprised by this news?
gears is without a doubt one of the most popular series on the 360, i'd have been more shocked if he said no.
what i'd like to see though is a prequel set when the locust first surfaced and attacked humanity on that planet, i forget what it's called.
and feature some characters who don't look like they eat nothing but elephant steroids.
what i'm saying is, how about a bit l...
i just hope they went through with their planned attack on the cia, because once they have the cia after them, they're fucked.
i just hope they like orange.
not buying the game might be a good start.
realising you paid good money for something that bad has got to damage your ego, surely. ^_^
yeah, attack the cia, they wont fight back or anything will they.
they do that and they wont end up in jail, they'll end up somewhere like guantanamo bay.
costs?
you can get a dvd player for less than 20 quid so getting the license can't be that expensive.
i bet it won't even play audio cds like the wii.
kinda pathetic really.
i would have thought it's the developer who failed when a game gets a low score.
oh no, that's where i sent my console. O_O
uh, i mean, ah, good, those filthy pirates. >_>
^_^
tie something like that cover control with a gun peripheral that lets the console know when you're pulling the trigger and you'd have an interesting game, even if it is on rails.
obviously it wont match a full control fps, but it could be good.
preaching to the converted here.
put those three letters together in that order, and i'm there.
the only thing i didn't like in the first game were the arbitrary limit on levelling, let me level up as much as i want and i'll be happy.
i did miss Uematsu's music though.
maybe they'll actually release the game in the uk finally.
what was it the bigots always say when there's an article about gay gamers or gay game characters?
oh yeah, "what does sex have to do with gaming?"
turns out it's everything apparently.
when are they going to realise they can't test an online game like that purely internally, you need large scale testing for this kind of product.
ignoring the fact that internal testing was less than effective before is just insane.
the definition of insanity is doing exactly the same thing again and again and expecting different results
for the whole family?
yeah maybe, but one at a time though.
the thing is, a touchscreen control isn't exactly a new innovation anymore.
when the ds did it, it was new, when the wii did motion controls, they were, well not new but they weren't being widely used, there were a couple of ps2 things that used motion controls and the eyetoy had some gesture based gaming, but it was still just a very tiny part of the gaming landscape.
millions of people have touchscreen devices these days, even relatively cheap smart...
the only people lulzsec are doing a favour to is pro choice advocates.