^ He's made that comments many times before.
It's a duplicate account anyways. If he wants to believe that console exclusives are only exclusive because they can't run on PC, then more power to him.
The 'spy on someone else playing the game' is also a neat feature. Although a bit creepy at the same time.
It'd be awesome to just take a quick glimpse of what your friends were playing.
It's just the headline that is twisting it.
It's more along the lines of people wanting to upgrade to max out BF3 rather than simply play it.
They just based it off the recommended specs too, instead of the minimum one.
"since the game is based first in open GL which ps3 specializes in first"
... and the PC doesn't? O.o
Reminds me of Jak3 personally.
EDIT: Figured I'd rev up the old nostalgia engine and watch a few Jak3 vids too.
Why is it that all my old games look better in my head? =x
Don't see why you need a large number of players to be playing a game.
As long as there's enough to fill a server at any given time, it's enough.
I played it at night with headphones.
It's a great enjoyable game in its own right (especially the audio) but it just doesn't evoke any sense of fear in me.
To me, it seems like an action game with some horror elements thrown in... kinda like how Doom3 was.
I equate it to a roller coaster. It scares you to induce a thrill, not to actually horrify you.
Also, I forgot about FatalFrame.
I still don't get how DeadSpace is scary.
SystemShock2, EternalDarkness and Penumbra series would've been a better replacement.
... looking for hits by posting a review with a score that is similar to what other reviewers are saying?
O.o
They could port the xbox version.
... but still, I have the games on PC, and they're mostly just for nostalgia purposes... even with mods.
The game probably looks better in your head than it actually is... and I'd rather R* focus on new games.
I don't know what's more disturbing, the article itself or the fact that there's people that can't stop hating on specific video game franchises.
Probably the article, but still... we get it, you don't like some game series. They aren't to blame for all of the world's problems though.
... did you read the 2nd page?
EDIT: Well, his main argument is on the 2nd page.
The first page is just the build-up.
The 2nd page also starts with, "But this, too, wasn't particularly unusual in its attitudes." showing that the things in the first page weren't that big of an issue to him.
I don't think the problem is with the actual difficulty.
The first and third bosses can be defeated without firing a shot... and the last one can be laughably easy if you're prepared.
It's just... compared to the rest of the game, the boss fights don't fit in. They just aren't designed as meticulously as the rest of the game is.
In a game like MGS, I'd look forward to the next boss fight... in HumanRev, I dreaded it because most of them...
I'd rather have them start making a PS3 that can play my old games.
Nothing wrong about the quality of the article. Yahtzee knows how to write.
What's got my confused is that why such an old article is being published now. (This articles was written a year ago.)
"STEAM had a sale on Mirrors Edge yesterday And It was cheaper then buying It from Origins when it was on sale"
Was the same price for me.
$5 from steam or $5 from Origin.
Only EA game I've seen for cheaper on Steam is BC2.
... when the age checker doesn't include your birthyear anymore.
'deserve' this game? O.o
I don't see what's wrong with more people getting to enjoy the game.
... or when he said that he'd play Uncharted3?
^ "The PC version will also see mods that just will not be possible on any other platform."
Actually, we don't know if there'll be mod support.
If EA hogs the server files like they did with BC2, then it's highly unlikely that we'll get mods.
----
"On the other hand, the community structure and friends interaction offered by consoles is unequaled by any PC system, be it Steam or otherwise."
...