It is the highest rated exclusives though according to metacritic.
"Free games may be free but I really don't understand how people can't see my point about how the people making them hold your head underwater until you have no choice but to pay money. If they didn't do this then they would never get any money from any one."
Games which hold your head underwater usually end up going bust since they discourage new players from joining in.
If you don't understand how a F2P game can be profitable witho...
... it's disappointing that they couldn't get the engine audio to sound better than reality, like they did with the visuals.
Well, that depends. If you want to pay a subscription and get access to 'free' games, then there's services like IGN-Prime, OnLive and Gamefly.
Aside from the game, the other features are free anyways such as cloud saving and automatic updates.
It sold low because it's simply too arcadey. It's a children's game and can't match the true authentic experience of the real farming simulator.
^ You must be unaware of the fact that PC games have DRM. Even if you bought a physical disc, it will likely have a CD Key, and you will have to install it.
Digitally buying them just means you don't have to worry about managing the CD and/or it's key, because it's all tied to one account.
As long as a game doesn't have DRM, then it doesn't matter how it was obtained. GoG for example, allows you to burn your purchased games onto a disc or ...
The equipment itself isn't really that much of a difference maker, since the pay-only equipment just allows for more options.
What is a concern is that paying members can get access to permanent (BPO) equipment. This means that they can die however many times they want, but won't get a monetary penalty because their equipment has unlimited uses (unlike regular equipment which is lost per death)
What ends up happening then is that paying members end up...
Objectifying the female form and using it as comparison to a handheld.
That'd be my guess.
I think it's clever to an extent, but fails because I don't think many people would find that lady attractive. Looks creepy to me. We're back to the PS3 demon baby.
Might as well find a way to get Planetside2 ported to the system.
They already sold the Game+AllDLC for ~$10 (or $12?) during the summer sale.
It was on the last day of the sale I believe.
... at the same time, if he wasn't developing anything for the system, then his comments are also put into doubt. Why would he praise a system, yet not develop a game for it if he thinks it's so great?
Games like BO2 and Halo4 don't really need to show gameplay. Their ads might as well be 30 seconds of a black screen with white text showing the game's name and release date.
I don't remember seeing any ads for Dishonored on TV though.
Then again, this is first ad for a PS3 exclusive I've seen in some time. Guess they're getting back on track in that regards.
Initially, I had assumed that EA would hand MoH back to West/Zampella... but now, it doesn't seem like that's going to happen (probably because W/Z want their own new IP)
I'm still wondering what those two are up to.
I doubt BF will become a yearly release though. DICE wouldn't do that.
Hmm, it didn't strike me that T2 was behind both Borderlands2 and XCOM.
With the way the release schedule was for both games, you'd think the two games were from competing publishers (despite being different genres)
Are they going to blame the loss on the accidentally-free games they unleashed a few weeks ago?
Actually, wow... marketing is a pretty big elephant.
They said the same thing about MoH 2010 as well.
So, one comment = trolling vita posts all morning?
(Seeing as how you agreed with his second one)
He does know that the system is new. He's just waiting for the good games to come before buying it since there aren't many out yet that he likes.
Why does his opinion warrant attacking him like that?
Edit: Telling someone to 'pull a giant stick out of their ass' is a bit more than just disagreeing.
Anyways, I don't real...
^ Wow, the guy just stated that he only found two games to be interesting to him, and you had to resort to personal attacks?
EDIT: I don't see where he's been trolling... aside from maybe one post that only applies if you have a very liberal definition of what 'trolling' is.
^ If they're actually running a marathon, they'll have to consider mobile phones as a threat down the line.
You can easily flip it around as well.
Nintendo is great at creating hardware (they have a history of innovative control schemes) while Sony is better at software (they have a great lineup of 1st party games)
I'd rather they keep doing their things and staying seperate. Competition is good for consumers.