I actually agree with bpmurr. I too, am glad we're getting some proper kb/m interface support in a PC game. It's been a while since we had one in a multiplat game.
If you're gonna use a controller anyway, play it on consoles. It's so much better that way. I mean, c'mon, this is the PC version and Kb/M is the norm here. Devs are gonna expect majority of us to use kb/m anyway. How many times have you seen console gamers asking for kb/m support for their console games? Probably be...
Yes, because us "PS3 fanboys & computer nerds" refuse to bend over for IW and Activision. Or maybe both our platforms have far better games than your RROD box that we don't go 'ga ga' over mediocre franchise-milking games.
What they did right was, they managed to do what EA Sports has been doing for years and actually make more money out of it.
NO. Just NO.
Fanboyism is justified to a certain level, but idiocy and utter retardedness is unacceptable in any form of normal behavior whatsoever.
Knowing Ubisoft's track record for the past 5 years, you're probably going to be disappointed in that department.
I hope Mitchell's back too, but if the game is set more than 15/20 years after GRAW2, then it's highly unlikely, at least in the field of action. He sounded like a veteran somewhere around 40 years of age in the last game. So if the game is more than 15/20 years after that, he'd be pushing 60, and out of action. Unless of course, he pulls a Rambo-like comeback, which sounds a bit too hollywood-ish.
Friggin' hilarious. Can't wait to play the game.
HAH! He's shaved? Looks a lot less doucheier in that pic. But whatever, I'm sure he'll come up with some form of stupidity to earn him this year's DOTY(Douchebag of the Year) award. It's his birthright now.
Obviously, there are a lot of people who want this game on the PC, and rightly so. Personally though, I won't be fuming even if it didn't come. First game was pretty decent, but I'm not sure there will be enough changes in the second game to hold my interest for long. For me, if it comes to PC, then great. If not, no problem.
I don't mind them not releasing the game in the same year as Starcraft 2, but if they delay it further than currently, I'm gonna be really pissed off.
I know it's the best looking console game ever. But what I'm saying is, when we're comparing it's graphics to Crysis, it becomes clear which is which. And how is Patcher's opinion on how the PS has redefined gaming gonna change the fact that Crysis beats UC2 in graphics? You are the the one blinded by your own fanboyism. I may be one too, but all I'm doing is point out one simple fact, while you ramble on about other things that are not gonna change that fact in any way whatsoever.
Anybody still thinking UC2 has better graphics?.......guess not.
(Yeah yeah, here comes the fanboys' disagrees.)
Why is the PC even brought into this? No game has beaten the original Crysis yet in terms of graphics. It doesn't have to prove anything to anybody. It's a fact. And why are UC2 fanboys bringing up the "better story/gameplay" or the "cost of machine" argument in a discussion about graphics alone? No matter how much it costs or how bad you think the gameplay is, Crysis is still hands down the best in photo-realistic graphics department, and you know what? It came out more t...
A HD5750? How does it perform in BC2? Average frame-rate for max details? Any DX11 results?
I know some people are anxious to see Reach footage, but that is too obviously fake.
If they're like EA Sports on PC, we'll be getting an annual release of Windows which have little to nothing new except for their names.
I saw your name and everything makes sense now.
That is hardly surprising. This is EA we're talking about. They did the same thing with The Sims 2 and haven't made a proper sports title for the PC since 2005. Besides, I've never really been a fan of Dead Space. It's a decent game but scary? Meh. I can live without that one.
If you think in terms of MW2 or another Halo game where it's just run n' gun, then you're probably right. But in this case, it's a tactical shooter. And if the devs don't try to market it to a "wider audience", then we might see a return of the old-skool Tom Clancy games where you get killed from a single bullet with no health regen. I miss Raven Shield. *sigh*
That is exactly what I've always been saying. PC gaming has huge potential to be light years ahead of it's current state. But due to corporate greed, it's being chained down.