Edit: Disregard this reply
...and Gears 2, but that's called a multiplayer skin. Referring to him as a "playable character" normally means there's something unique to him.
That cliched videogame story has also been tied with some of the best level designs ever seen in the past 20 years.
Apparently, the guy above you (shikamarooo) thinks it'll only be a "challenge".
I'm sure is aware of how unfair it'll be, so they'll have PS3-only lobbies. They have to in order to make sure they don't lose part of their fanbase.
That's a weak counter-argument (imo).
Their description gave a perfectly good reason for choosing that title. Alan Wake's a quality title anyway.
I pre-ordered online.
Did Bioware ever specify if this seven day headstart is only granted to Origin pre-orders, or will I get a code in the mail via email from Gamestop (and other retailers)?
Thank you for clarifying. The reason it still comes off as a quick jab is because some people fail to recognize Hollywood-and film in general-has changed since the early 80's (around that time). While they're putting the most money down for "X generic bid budget film" rather than "the next Star Wars of our time", it's also because the cost were relatively black and white.
Technology has enabled those big execs to basically tell everyone mor...
To me, it came off as essentially saying "job well done" more than anything. Rather than say "no other bloggers should even try", he's saying "this is the kind of blog that wins monthly contests".
I could be wrong, but I don't see the statement as being completely literal.
Wouldn't be surprised if this is the arcade GOTY of 2012.
Off topic: Did anyone else view an Autozone ad before the vid? Just something that felt misplaced.
It's not about these moves by EA solely affecting him, but rather many (or specific) gamers in general.
"It seems as of lately that the cinema that turns up on the silver screen has done very little to help conceal the notion that Hollywood—a term I use for the sake of argument, hasn’t been on their A-game when it comes to making 'good movies'."
The jab at "Hollywood" is wrong in many cases. What's often forgotten by most is those blockbuster movies aimed solely at big budget effects (bar Inception) are what allow movie execs to stretch their ...
I may be the only approval (so far), but be patient. One thing I've learned from n4g's approval system: If your article is trollbait, it'll most likely go through in an instant. Most quality articles are slow-burners.
It's a shame considering they had a chance at redemption from their BS from last gen. Still can't get over that exclusive NFL deal they had because of the competition delivering football games of better quality.
That title's full of win.
That' heavily dependant on what they play. Shouldn't be any problem is he/she wished to game with a friend on LEGO Star Wars. XBL becomes an awful idea for someone that age if they cross over into a shooter.
Thank you :)
I misspoke when it came to 2011 shooter hiatus. I'm actually on a hiatus of every other genre except FPS' right now :P. That is until TOR comes.
@TheBlackMask
From fluffydecisions' post: "AW was good but so much potential was left from other areas in the map."
Since this sentence is subjective, it leaves another poster to [respectfully] disagree with said person who made the initial response. That doesn't mean either side is inherently wrong, it just shows there's two sides of the coin.
Edit: Who knows maybe all 8 of the 360 fanboys are just disagree troll...
I think there's a few youtube channels of people constantly making fun of bad movies using that feature.