I agree on looking forward to it. I enjoyed the James Bond 007: Bloodstone. I am still going back to play it since its release (single player). It has many appeals in its presentation alone. Being James Bond is enough to play, right? LOL
One may be that you hear a cuss words every 4 minutes more or less (overused). Not many know this but the type of dialog is one of the biggest parts that drives and or breaks down the game. Another would be a game with hardly any dialog in the story (intelligent or otherwise). The story can go flat and the game runs the chance of loosing its credibility as a solid game. (Great) Action and Words go together.
Yes, it seemed as those the audience were kids the way he was going at it. But I think it was because of his lack of English grammar for expressing exciting moments. That and maybe he was the stand in person. The original staff member was unavailable. LOL
By the way, new take downs through the wall and the sleeper hold on the enemy with your legs and feet from above ... AWESOME!
In the next installment of Batman. Although I will enjoy the dialog and combat moves of Catwoman. I do not care for the unnecessary bare cleavage for Catwoman in the next installment of Batman. Being a guy, I still found it distracting and bothersome. Past depictions of Catwoman did not need this distraction of extra bare cleavage. To express her feminine side (not like a Prostitute mind you). But I am seeing a theme here. Last Batman game produced from Rocksteady. Poison Ivy had the same det...
Yes, every demo I have seen proves that. DICE made a comment about it? I would like to know what they said. I am sure it was some kind of weak excuse to those gamers or non gamers who have made comments about it. But can you imagine what positive things would come out in their favor? As I mentioned above. :)
"Everyone is going to be happy" with Battlefield 3.- Minus one (at least).
There is something about getting an ear bleed every four minutes, more or less, during a game that is distracting to some. Yes, I favor games with optional graphic content filters (confusingly only a few developers do). It gives the player more of an option on how they choose to play a game. Besides, this would create even more new fans and more sales.
From the interviews of the staff members responsible for putting this game together and demos I have seen. This game is heading in the right direction. Even hints from a recent demo interview with gamespot.com reveals plans for a sequel. This not only proves that this is not a movie based game but a game with a separate story. It also shows they are serious developers. Developers who are planning for Captains appearance in the future to be even more brighter than the present.
For some reason ... that was a understandable distraction. His last comment seemed to be fitting tho. Girls play MW3. But he should have walked towards the MW3 side of the video.
I got an ear bleed just listening to a pretty girl curse and swear and trying to be intelligent at the same time. The guy with the mic just lacked intelligence.
What separates Ghost Recon from those other shooters. Is not just that it is in 3rd person. But you (or you alone) are needing to plan smart combat maneuvering attacks on your hostiles. Instead of guns blazing or being lead by the hand. Knowing lives (hostages) are in danger if you don't use your head. Makes the experience more realistic as well.
From what I read and an video interview on this subject of Video Games based on movies. The game has it's own story, apart from the movie. The only thing similar is the setting being in the WW2 era. :)
Funny ... they have one picture for PS3 and Xbox. And the rest are Wii and DS. The Wii and DS have totally different game mechanics (Saturday morning cartoons) from what the PS3 and Xbox version is presenting.
If they could have the playable character of Catwoman as a separate part of the story experience. Something like how the Joker was a playable character in the last game. That would not interfere the flow of the experience of being Batman.
I was trying to avoid reading this review. Why bother? ... but thanks for reposting anyway. I am only agreeing with your comment at the end of your posting.
I did not bother reading this review (if you want to call it that). Maybe his personal life is messing up his emotions and logic. The score reveals that someone else may need a review done by their Shrink.
..."more things to do and cool things to find ..."
Indeed and that is what breaks up the flow of the story and it's stronger potential impact (the ending was epic tho). My second time through RDR I stuck more to the story, avoided side missions. LA Noire, you can go on side missions but it never seemed to break up the flow of the story (although the over use of the F-bomb did at times). I have a hard time not dreaming up LA Noire type elements at night while I sleep (cas...
Agree, there is certainly a big difference. Even ask my niece. LOL
swishersweets20031- Relax, it's not your type of game and you maybe misunderstanding the kind of game it is (a story driven detective game). In doing so you may appreciate it more. Example; A detective repeats the procedure to get better at what they do best. You might want to reread the article. I believe most of your remaining comments have been mentioned and debunked. Good day to you fellow gamer. :)
Good idea ... but lets hope the friend and you don't start a fight over who plays Cole Phillips. And you may now have another case to solve with possible serious results. LOL
This YouTube.com video is a better view in motion of the photos taken for the 360 version. In my opinion it is not much to get bent out of shape over. Look between 3:15-4:00. Follow the lighting/reflections on the poltrol car front to back. It does show some shading and light reflection effects differences. As a 360 owner I say this as I shrug my shoulders, "Oh, well. Not a big deal." :)
Video is the Xbox Version.
5386d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment
I see your point with Poison Ivy. I had the same thoughts. But still ..... LOL