Raging storm!
But remember that Switch has a lot in common with Nvidia Shield (that Switch could've been called the Shield K1.5 tablet, for all I know), all that work to make a port for the Switch might be worth it 'cause the game could hit that market as well. Not long ago, Nvidia was trying to give a push to the shield line with games like Crysis3, Borderlands 2 and Trine2 on the shield, shield games might be easily tweaked for the switch and down the road, for capable enough android platforms.
We don't always agree Rory, but I agree that having an exclusive character like Samus could be fun, I don't know why most of the guys think is such a bad Idea, Soul Calibur II did that and I've a lot of fond memories of that game, Link was a cool character to have.
One of my favorites, I still have it on my PSP (2000) but the ghosting is awful on the screen with this game, I wish I could download it on my VITA but it's not available on the platform, damn digital games. Maybe is time to hack the little thing, VAE VICTIS!
ATM, only if you enjoy Nintendo games, you can play some triple A and indie games on the go and on a tv with a windows/android tablet, but when more exclusives games are released, plus some extra features, it can make a great companion kit for your gaming and travel needs.
If the hardware doesn't sell beyond 20 millions they'll still profit thanks to software and licensing, that is why they don't go third party, Nintendo has great 1st party software attachement rates and they also turn a profit of any third party or indie game that solds on their platforms, as little as the last one may be, its still something they woulnd't want to give up.
Nintendo has its own way of making business, it carves it's own market by keeping p...
Same here, old Bill was my character. Left for Dead is one of the games I've gifted the most, even to this day, I talk friends into the game.
Still different 'cause those other remasters didn't had extra fees for DLC or online support.
Last of us had all the dlc included , multiplayer support and wasn't a full priced game, Zelda windwaker had some new features built in the game and it wasn't a full price game, Gears, for some time, came bundled with the entire gears collection on Xbox1 and it was released at $30 for PC.
@Neonridr I agree that there are always going to be defects but not offering a fix or a replacement for those productions defects is wrong and unacceptable, you can't be serious about defending this, even microsoft had a replacement program with the RROD fiasco. You aren't having an issue, good for you, let's not pretend that a lot of people aren't having a pleasant ride, there is the left joycon issue that even the patch hasn't fixed for some people and the official state...
Everyone saw that coming, soon it will probably run better than the docked switch version, better internal resolution, framerate lock, AA, filtering, etc.
Why so sour Veneno? Both have great gameplay and the question was which one should I play. I choose to play both. I'm not being indifferent, you could've asked which of them I like more, and in that case I'll enjoy this Zelda more but I can see that Horizon is an amazing game and a technical accomplishment, I don't need to throw dirt to a game to justify my opinion, I like both games.
I agree. I remember the wavebird, it was such an amazing wireless controller, never experienced a problem with it, is hard to imagine that the same company is having issues with a wireless controllers, there must be a lot going on in those little gamepads, I hope it gets resolved soon for those early supporters that are experiencing issues with it.
Gameplay is king, that's why I'll play both!
I already know ocelot07, I thought that was obvious as the legendary edition was released 3 years before the special edition . My point was that it didn't have any "new content" for the special edition, should've been more specific, didn't think that I needed to point that out, I'll keep that in mind for the next time. Maybe I should also point out that the sound was downgraded and that the PS4 version modding feature is gimped, right?
Cube i7 Stylus for example (270-330$) https://www.youtube.com/wat...
Chuwi Hi12 (230-310$) https://www.youtube.com/wat...
Teclast Tbook 10 (230-260$) https://www.youtube.com/wat...
Some people love the game so much that wish to keep playing the game on the go, others never played the game and know they don't hang enough time at home and wish to keep playing whenever they have the chance. Switch is a strong tablet, do you really think that the game would be downgraded? Similar tablets run the game well at the same target resolution without having to downgrade it with a performance mod, and these don't have maxwell cores.
The remastered version doesn't have aditional content, its only a remaster, not a remake, this means it just have nicer graphics and it isn't a night to day change if you compare it to the PC version, the graphical upgrade was more significant if you came from the console version and the real deal was that the console version was now moddable to some extend. If switch version is vanilla Skyrim it's the same game as the remaster. In reality, it will be an optimized version for the ...
That's shame, if you don't have a way to play the PC version on the go but you're planning on having a switch, why give it the cold shoulder because it's not the last console remaster?
You have every right to be upset and annoyed by Nintendo stupidity Nodoze. I also feel betrayed as well and I do believe this is gonna cost Nintendo some old school fans (that won't pass the torch to their kids), I've seen some comments like yours online. They only produced like a 1.5 million of a product that was very nostalgic and appelling to those who lived and enjoyed the NES days, over 34 million people, so only a few of those fans would've been able adquire one. Like always...