this game looks to be extremely impressive from a technical point of view
I'm not a fan of serious racing games but this one looks like it deserves a purchase.
yeah same, except 6 because it was failpie
yeah even though bc2 is a buggy console port like every damn game these days
if they made it properly (you know, by not being idiots - still totally possible to make the pc version better without sacrificing the console version) it would have sold even more
battlefield 3 will also be a buggy mess of awesome, and the next bf after that will be the same - etc.
but yeah. devs are severely underestimating the scale of the pc audience. Also, dx11 ...
"Crytek's debut on Xbox 360"
lol fail, clearly the reviewer hasn't heard of farcry instincts: evolution - but meh, details
ok, I meant third person shooter - but thats a minor detail anyway.
and you "can" have a mmofps/'tps' but it will never have as good shooting as a pure fps/tps, it is just too demanding on the server and networking for it to have shooting that works nicely like in halo, cs, cod etc - they can only get it to work if they implement some sneaky tricks which will ruin the feel of the game.
:P
dynasty warriors has room for improvement though, it's just dissapointing me that they keep making the same thing somehow.
yes because crysis was a little boring
yes because it will run smoother (or not, see next line)
no because it will be consolized
no because the multiplayer is really messy (I watched about 2 minutes of it being played, now I shall find out for myself and probably end up being correct)
it will probably be just as good/bad as the original - though for different reasons. the only thing that made the original good was the graphics (and other tech, physics ...
Have they actually made the game good this time though?
5 was the best it's been (though admitedly not enough of an improvement from 4). 6 had slightly better graphics but they took loads of content out and messed up the characters.
I remember the original (in-game rendered) trailer for 6 when it was going to be a ps3 exclusive, a little bit later it was announced multiplat and the game that ensued was horrible.
A lot of people bash DW fo...
yeah, ff13 was junk because they had none of the talent who were there to make the good ff games. square just rode along on the IP and used the success of the previous games to make some cash.
The true ff13 is lost odyssey because it involved key talent in it's development team.
So true.
It's really frustrating though because most people are idiots who can't think for themselves (or think they are thinking for themselves but they just aren't) and they ruin things for the rest of us - the game industry suits know this and are exploiting it.
Agreed. Over marketing will be the demise of the industry (or at least, it will kill some big franchises which it already has: cases in point being CoD, FF and GH).
People think a game will be awesome simply because it is marketed very well, the marketing budgets are often ten times that of the actual production costs - doesn't that say something?
You can totally tell when a game is going to be junk just by the trailers/adverts etc. But this is something ...
I got the beta invite but ignored it (mostly because gamersfirst looks like legit spam, like er, facebook apps and stuff)
This game is a badly programmed mess anyway, I have little faith that they can repair it without reprogramming the entire engine from the ground up.
I would have you know that they ignored the bug reports made by their entire floor of in-house QA testers, so they deserve everything that is coming to them.
Oh also, a fpsmm...
the article explains nothing
except "the map design and the nature of the constantly changing match objectives"
I don't know why people think snipers are campers, the snipers that kill you the most are probably running all around the map taking medium range shots and going for the objectives. The ones who sit in a spot are just noobs who can't hit anything anyway.
I tend to use all "classes" in games and stick with the ones...
lol this article is a pile of crap.
"Black uses less power"
lol what a load of idiocy. The damn backlight will be using the SAME AMOUNT OF ENERGY!!! Black pixels only use less energy in OLED screens, which aren't in mass market yet.
Unless that is, you have dynamic contrast on. Which is the first thing you turn off when you get a monitor anyway because it is total fail.
"Switch to LED
LED screens feature individual LEDs to pr...
yeah the people who think mass effect is great just havn't played the right games before hand. probably because the 360 was the first console they had or that mass effect was highly marketed so a lot of idiots were going to play it not knowing that its not such a good game
lol idiot, the hardware in handheld consoles is going to be far behind the hardware which android and windows 7 phones will be using. Also iPhones don't have flash, duh.
no it is san andreas, trust me
old news? (for some)
dvd will fail the game anyway, unless they make it pc/ps3 only but I highly doubt that would happen because take2's shareholders would complain about the millions of lost xbox sales
To make a game with enough content which is up to the latest standards they really need more than 7GB. They could do that for Blu-ray but they need to capture the entire gaming market to fund the project so that is why it will lack in content just as gta4 ...
6 people who read darkpower's comment were 13 year olds
thats another good point. the multiplayer in gta4 was lacking. the MP just needed a lot more polish and options.
for one, you couldn't even damn kick someone from your game if you were host, what was up with that?
and looking for games turned up ones with various differences in the settings, auto aim what the hell?