CRank: 5Score: 49400

Confirmation bias

493d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

Really didnt like the witcher 3.

493d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

Lmao

493d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

I found the witcher 3 to be dry. Struggled hard to get through that game, but it showed me that people really like their cutscenes and “adult” material.

Bethesda doesn’t need modders to do anything. Their games succeed at launch without mods even being present. The mods just give a way for the game to be added to over time. Its brilliant.

493d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

It appears you have it all figured out. Maybe phil doesn’t need to go, maybe gamers need to stop being overstimulated and lrarn to find value in things that even they do not personally like. Maybe if people were more patient and understanding, it wouldn’t be so bad.

493d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

People need to be reminded what real mediocrity is.

493d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Dlc seems fine to me so far.

493d ago 1 agree22 disagreeView comment

Ive seen star wars outlaws get a few 4s and 5s and it has me wondering what the heck players have been smoking. But I think people need to be reminded what actual trash content is.

493d ago 2 agree22 disagreeView comment

Starfield is fine, but its not for everyone

493d ago 5 agree29 disagreeView comment

People now and days dont even know what a soul is

493d ago 5 agree10 disagreeView comment

Its just a score, doesn’t really mean anything

493d ago 1 agree30 disagreeView comment

@Kyro
Other studios have not surpassed Bethesda. Sure, other rpgs are better in certain areas, but it has literally always been like this. When Skyrim took the world by storm, there were games with better visuals (Mass effect), games with deeper combat(Dragons dogma 2 or kingdoms of amalur), rpgs with deeper writing (Mass Effect 2-3 and even dragon age 2), rpgs with superior presentation and animations (again, Mass Effect 2-3), etc. No one else makes games quite like Bethesda, and th...

494d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

Its not empty, you just dont like what is there. I could say breath of the wild and tears of the kingdom are “empty”.

494d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

Not necessarily. The content seems lacking in respect to just how gargantuan, the tame is. But there is alot of content in starfield. And people have to stop with the empty planets. Did people really think they would handcraft random landing zones? Come on people…think.

494d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

@IAMREALhooman

Depends on how you look at it. For someone looking for the stimulation of just having a cutscene play out because they picked a certain dialogue option *cough* BG3, these types of players will not like starfield. The planets do not have stimulating content, but potential, potential surpassing most other games. If you are someone looking to build, the empty planets become more alluring, because its a playground where you can find the resources to build…but the...

494d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

@RPGer You may want to specify what you mean exactly, befause Starfield has more raw content than all the games you listed combined.

494d ago 0 agree4 disagreeView comment

Right in front of you. More content than most games out.

494d ago 3 agree39 disagreeView comment

Thats what happens when you go to procedurally generated locations. Somehow people thought they were going to be able to handcraft all of that space in 5-8 years. Insane.

494d ago 7 agree2 disagreeView comment

Outlaws is solid.

497d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

When you hear someone say “its not the drsgon age game we want”, just think Baldurs Gate 3. Thats what people eant from Bioware.

497d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment