Yea because the competition is pretty fierce when its comes to space combat sims, seeing how there's so many to choose from.
Not like Chris Roberts has any experience in the genre. I'll bet he's just laughing away, knowing he has no idea what to do.
I mean we all know that unless a publisher fronts that money a game is doomed to fail. There is a huge difference between publisher money and gamer money. This is why NO game has ever failed to live u...
They might have made just a bit more sales if they had picked a different title. ":The Video Game" usually means garbage.
They finally realized that paying a company to make DRM that is 100% guaranteed to fail and frustrates your paying customers was a bad idea.
Project CARS and Star Citizen would like a word with you.
If its self-published by the developer, its an indie game. Unless Sony actually funds the development, its still an "indie" game.
Fact: Big budget does not mean better game.
Pachter is for the big money movers, so of course he's going to say indies aren't worth anything. They're made without a big publisher.
Big publishers don't like the idea of self publishing.
Color me surprised, financial analyst says only the big budget titles are worthy of GOTY. Shocking.
Obvious ass-kisser is obvious.
Unless data was actually copied I call it a coincidence. They do look similar, but doing the same kinds of things is not the same as using the same data.
This is why I am having a hard time understanding all the disagrees. Though I think it has a lot to do with not reading the article.
A large open world with tombs and puzzles, not sure how that is bad. Actual exploration seems like a good fit for TR.
@GentlemenRUs
Are you serious? This article was like 4 paragraphs long and said nothing about making TR an RPG.
Massive open world to explore + Tomb Raider.
Hardly call that a bad idea.
If you are prone to motion sickness it will.
To push for something NOT Windows. To offer an alternative where none exists.
Worth noting that this isn't the "first" attempt at creating a procedural universe at a massive scale. It will probably be the first full on game to do that. Space engine has a procedural universe.
That isn't meant to downplay what these want to create, it will definitely be unique.
Just kind of sucks that it took so long for this idea to finally get noticed. I was hyped since those Infinity tech demos were released years back.
Not a single mention of any of the successful Early Access titles.
Love how the lack of transparency is supposed to be a good thing. Gamers are so distanced from the process that its entirely mysterious to them. Maybe if they were more informed they wouldn't react as badly.
Maybe Gamers need to pull their heads out of their out of their collective asses and learn to read. I'm sorry, I have ZERO sympathy for impulse buyers who don't read or ask qu...
If you really think it doesn't look good then you aren't looking close enough. Go read more about what the game features if you are really curious.
I could say it looks really good for not being finished yet, but that will hardly convince you. You want some sort of dissertation on the source of this hype. Well if you don't get it and can't see it then, there's not much I can tell you. Its you, who should research the game, not everyone else.
Well when you are primed to respond to wild and crazy reveals at E3, you tend to judge everything the same way.
Then there is the concept of a game being in alpha that, to my surprise, confuses so many gamers. Its starting to make sense that devs keep the process secret, gamers are a dull bunch at times.
Its a racing game, which features cars...racing. What do you want them to do, add a few guns to spice things up?
Let's not forget its still not in beta. I really don't know what your expectations are, but they may be slightly high. Especially since its not feature complete yet.
Also keep in mind Project CARS has little to no marketing budget at this time. Meaning no fancy reveals. Just the gamers that have the game, which is where those videos come f...
What hype? Metro 2033 barely had any hype at all.
According to the author it was disappointing because it was sexist.
What does EA and DLC have to do with this game?
What proof do you have the devs are embezzling the funds for this game?
Not sure what your overall point is, beyond the random EA rage.