Still so much misinformation about PSNow.
PSNow costs twice as much as Game Pass? Only if you buy month to month. If you buy a whole year, PS Now is $20 cheaper.
Article also completely fails to acknowledge that you can DOWNLOAD all PS4 games. You do not have to stream.
Microsoft hasn't done it either, which is my whole point. So what in the world are you talking about?
What does Sony games on any platform have to do with Microsoft? Well, it has to do with the articles claim that "Xbox talks the talk of bringing any game you want to play to any platform you want to play it on. Microsoft may be the only player in the gaming space that can actually do it."
Do you get it? That's a stupid claim like I sa...
What? What exactly can Microsoft do that Sony couldn't? Any company could create a Window's store that offered a subscription service.
Also please tell me how Microsoft is going to bring Sony's games to any platform? Good luck with that.
Call of Duty has been the top selling franchise in the US for 10 straight years. It isn't going anywhere.
Not at $300. They've been able to hold a high price for a long time. PS2 and PS3 had steady price drops.
PS2 went from 300 to 129 in less than 6 years (similar to where we are in this gen).
PS3 went from $50p (cheaper model) to $269 (cheapest model) in about 6 years.
PS4 should be around $200 soon.
It isn't a scam. It is taking advantage of an untapped market. And it looks extremely terrible considering it is for those with handicaps.
Phil Spencer was in charge of Microsoft Studios last gen. He doesn't get to shed any blame.
Could be a new force power! That was like a good 10 foot away.
Because he has to do all that right? Do you see Sony or Nintendo people yapping every week? No. Phil is a mouthpiece.
The game peaked on Twitch during beta, downhill from there with spikes during content updates and that is it.
Who promised it back then? Cause Sony isn't promising it now. Just some random website making their own clickbait claims.
That's what I'm trying to figure out. I must have missed something. Their most recent games are all massive successes. Just because they announced some mobile game, apparently they are dead.
Oh wow he was in a cutscene? Do I have to be specific for you all. He was never a playable character. So, stop with the "cut from the game". You know exactly what characters come with the base game. Anything else they can charge for if they wish. They don't make these characters appear out of thin air. They spend time on it, they can charge you for it.
What's wrong with being hyped? Doesn't mean we have to buy it.
With that said, Sony has brought the games for 4 straight generations. They haven't let us down.
Uh no, I'm talking about them because I'm responding to you, who is acting like one.
I don't think Microsoft ever said that all Scarlett games will work on X1X or X1. Care to share that source?
No, he was never in the game. But I see how that lie would make your point better.
@sampsonon
1) Having character customization takes resources and maybe they didnt want to spend on those. Most single player driven games don't offer that.
2) The game is canon. It makes sense for the main character to not be customizable.
I won't get into your other SJW bull.
I wasted money on Switch. Not enough Nintendo exclusives when you leave out games that were on WiiU. Just mostly shovel ware otherwise.
Yes, expansions and DLC is where they make up for the rest.