Well duh, If I go buying groceries, would I take a Vita with me? No. If I go on a long train ride, would I take a Vita with me? Of course!
It doesn't matter which device we carry around more, what matters is which device we want to use for our gaming.
Your lack of logic makes me think you have a smartphone and carry it around more than you do your brain.
It's the best of WWE games in a while now, but what a difference an extra year in development would make. There's a lot of things they could iron out and improve.
Who said that smartphones are not a threat to dedicated gaming handhelds? I don't remember anyone saying that. What I remember is uninformed people who have failed to grasp the differences between a smartphone game and Uncharted: Golden Abyss, or the differences between controls via touchscreen and gyroscope and touchscreen, 2 analog sticks, 4 directional buttons, 4 face buttons, 2 shoulder buttons, rear touch panel, sixaxis.
Of course smartphones are making a dent in han...
I see where you're coming from, I really do. It's just that I personally liked the story of XIII. It's all subjective and there's no sense in starting an argument about that. And another opinion opposite to yours, the gameplay mostly irritated me, it was the story that kept me going until the end.
I don't know what you've been saying in news concerning FFXIII, because I don't recall your comments or name from them, and I'm too lazy to find out ...
@gnb2003
What comes to those specific exclusives. Of course there are people who prefer certain exclusives over other exclusives, I never denied that. But the thing is, saying that exclusives don't matter is ridiculous. Exclusives do matter, but which lineup of exclusive games is best is a subjective matter and thus no lineup of exclusive games can be said to be universaly the best.
I actually agree with both you and gamingdroid, it was just the way how he formed ...
Just like iamnsuperman (and I) find it sad that multiplayer is taking over and hindering singleplayer in some games, you would find it sad if games with good multiplayer would start decreasing in numbers and quality, would you not? It's not about being sad of someone having a different taste than you, it's about being sad of losing something you've learned to love.
I want to experience a great adventure and a good story. I find games which are geared towards multi...
@NEW-AGE
Runescape is a Java based game, not flash. AFAIK it's impossible to play RS via the PS3 browser.
@gamingdroid
Mario and Nintendo are one of the most popular franchises today, but that doesn't mean that everything exclusive to PS3 is "extra and unwanted" for everyone. Maybe that is the case for you, but your choice of words and talking in plural seems like you think you're talking on behalf of other people too. News flash, you're not.
I'm going to LOL if they counter troll the Xbox fanboys who call Sony fanboys the Sony Defence Force, and give the game a name that acronyms SDF.
That warning lasts like 3 seconds.. Is it really going to ruin your day?
I was expecting something more for 4.00 too, but you're just troll-whining.
I hope they make a prequel and tell us something "new" about the early days of The Boss and Big Boss. I'll settle with what happened to Raiden in between of MGS2 & MGS4 too though (unless that's what Rising is about, is it?).
Back when PS3 was announced, a FF7 remake seemed like the best possible thing in the world. But looking at it now, could they actually pull it off without dividing the fans?
If they kept the core gameplay mostly the same, there would be a big bunch of people saying that it's not on par with todays standards when it comes to battle system. RPG fans seem to be a little divided between those who loved FF13-like linear but fluent battle system, and those who want SE to go bac...
I believe it is, or at least it has diminished some. That's just a natural progression from the internet era. Back in 80's and 90's there was no social game news sites like N4G, youtube etc. Now that we have them, those who are anxious to get a certain game on their hands ease their pain by finding out about the game. Reading or watching videos about gameplay etc.
The few game magazines back in the days couldn't yield such massive amount of details including s...
But I don't want to know. I want to explore and discover.
I've learned my lesson with reading every other article about an upcoming game. No bigger buzzkill than overhype and knowing half of the game before it's launched.
For that hardware the price is cheap.
That line of launch titles is one of the best in gaming history.
The devices are not in direct competition. I have one of the best, if not the best smartphone out right now (SGS2), and while I do get some enjoyment of spending 10 minutes playing some casual games on it while waiting a bus etc, it can't compare to the games Vita will have on any level.
Smartphones will and probably already have taken ...
Major lol at all you who only read the headline.
They're not quitting on used game sales. They're putting new and used games together, with used games on the front and the only way to differentiate between new and used will be to look for a tiny word "new" or "used" on the sticker.
I want a good story, fun gameplay and maybe something out of this world sometimes too. I also want the scenery to be either beautiful and colorful (Uncharted, Halo) or ugly in a certain moody way (Fallout 3, RAGE, Dead Space).
What I don't want is a game that is supposed to be realistic and tries to simulate (loosely) a real war that's going on or happened for real. Nor do I want games that have a half-assed 5-h singleplayer campaign and the rest is all multiplayer. I...
Does the writer really think that the WWE of today is the same it was 2 years ago? I see a major change that's been happening in the programs of WWE. Though there's still a lot of room for improvement, but it's going in the right direction.
About the review itself: It was a decent one, especially considering that this is CVG.
To clarify: Read the article.. If you don't, my previous comment won't make any sense. Long story short, they're putting new games and used games to the same shelves, with new games at the back behind the used ones, and the only way you will tell them apart is from tiny little words "new" & "used" in their stickers.
Me neither. I play many different games from many different genres but apparently my brother-in-law who only plays CoD is more of a gamer than I am.
This article right here is ignorance in it's fullest. How biased and blinded by brand loyalty do you need to be to think that a single game is for everyone?