Nintendo has their priorities askew. This game is being demanded by North American Wii U owners.
I love how #TooMuchWater is trending on Twitter right now.
"One of the best new franchises from Ubisoft..."
*holds back laughter*
Their loss. It's the best game released so far this year.
Could've been more original with the thumbnail, pal.
"If you're looking to score yourself a gamer girl, then this article will help you quite a bit!"
This is N4G, not Buzzfeed. Sorry.
Gimme some Persona 5 info and we're good, Atlus!
Wow...talk about taking advantage of a name. 25% is a terribly low ratio.
It's been time to cut back on annual game releases for the last five years.
The critics overreacted. It's not as bad as Sonic '06. Don't get me wrong: Sonic Boom is a buggy, broken, poorly designed piece of garbage that was rushed, but Sonic '06 was supposedly a redemption. It was treated with promise upon announcement, but nosedived faster than Sonic himself.
People kind of knew Sonic Boom would suck from the start.
Yeah, that stuff happened with Fallout: New Vegas a few years back. One point from the required metascore to receive a bonus.
Should. Won't.
A lot more than kids these days think.
Please, no more of this "one way per page" thing. It's such a pain to deal with.
OT: Bayonetta is a fine series and the criticisms are from people who find sexuality in general to be a bad thing. It's pathetic and incredibly narrow-minded. There's no one right way to make a good video game heroine, but I will not deny for a second that Bayonetta is a fantastic one.
Super underrated for sure. Must-play!
I honestly wouldn't be against a score-less system.
Cool story, but not everyone thinks that way, especially in the wake of next-gen.
I'm not blind to the next-gen hype haze, but I know a lot of people that are, hence why the PS4 has been selling like hotcakes. New stuff makes consumers' eyes light up. It's the same way with games. The average consumer (not necessarily me or you) takes review scores as gospel, and while I completely agree that's a problem, that's their decision to make. If they want to fall...
Exactly. If more sites had 5 mean the average (or was interpreted that way), then this wouldn't be a problem. I don't even know if there's a solution to be found here. It's all based around interpretation.
I feel like it's the skewed school system grading scale that's made review scores so misinterpreted. When you're in grade school and a 7/10 means average, that conditioning is going to affect when you read a review score on a website. It's difficult to re-acquaint your mind with a full range when your own schooling is based around anything below a 6/10 being an F, a failure.
Also, people go nuts over games getting 8's or 7's because publishers hype up ...
"Starting"?