Well you kind of did, considering you clicked on the article and posting a comment.
I clicked disagree because I simply disagree. And before you pull that fanboy card on me, consider the fact I don't even own or want a Wii U. You trolled on a Wii U article saying it will do poorly but failed to explain why it will. Baseless. That is why I (and probably many others) clicked disagree. PS4 and 720 will be my consoles, but man the Wii U hate is pathetic.
It's real next gen though.
I am with you on this one. I am playing Victory (my first HDN game, actually) out of curiosity and loving it. Wish I discovered this franchise sooner though. :(
Yet to play Demon's Souls. I just subscribed to PS+ when Disgaea 3 came out for the Vita Instant Game Collection. I was skeptical of PS+ when it first launched in (I think) 2010 but now the service is so well-established and the game choices have improved it's irresistible.
Nobody really knows that, though. For all we know all three could do similar in success. That would be great for the sake of the entire industry and the gaming community.
How do you know that the Wii U will only sell as much as the Gamecube? Look at the 3DS first year sales and how fanboys on the internet spell doom & gloom but it appears to be an even faster selling handheld than the predecessor.
You can't play Nintendo Wii U games on a PS4, despite its more powerful hardware. That is something people tend to forget.
"...largely blaming a lack of momentum in Square-Enix games for the loss."
Fixed.
Wow so much PC hate in this post it's disturbing...
PC costs more because the platform itself is multipurpose and the hardware is built for a plethora of applications besides gaming, including rendering graphics/videos and developing games, while a PS3 is for living room gaming first and digital entertainment second. The browser in a PS3 is abysmal and you would NEED a PC for that anyway. A $600 gaming rig can run most games on med-high settings and crappy home desktop PCs with no graphics card at Best Buy cost about that much, and I am guessi...
I get what you mean but sometimes with PC versions of a game you get the odd port that lack a significant leap in visual quality from a console version. But nonetheless, the game looks great on both platforms. If you have a PC that can run this game at decent settings you'd probably buy the PC version otherwise just get the game on whatever console you own or prefer...
Sales boost tells me otherwise?
PSVita costs less to manufacture than the consumer price. The loss for Sony mostly comes from the R&D costs. R&D is an expensive procedure for developing a product like this, especially one expected to have a 10-year market lifecycle. Business is bigger than it looks.
Everything Patcher says really means the opposite.
I am a die hard Sony loyalist and I agree with almost none of your post. How bitter. :(
At least Nintendo games are rich in quality and are usually just as fun as their predecessors, if not better. If the fans want more of these games they will continue to buy them, and it appears people are still buying them. It would be stupid for Nintendo to axe Mario and Zelda for some "new" third person shooter IP.
Far from a perfect game but it is still enjoyable and has its fans that appreciate the game for its qualities, myself included. FFX is linear and has an annoying protagonist but everyone is jumping over joy over the HD remake.
I'll believe MS themselves sooner than I would Alex Jones. Sorry, but I think this is bull.
Release Zelda, Mario Kart, and Super Smash Bros...problem solved.