It is a bad game and Sean did lie a lot, but you can still enjoy a bad game. Doesn't make it a good game just because you enjoy it though. I enjoy Dizzy on the NES even though it's terrible.
Was thinking this too.
They took the Polo out of Marco-Polo. Not to mention it runs even worse than it did on release; that itself has to be some sort of Guinness World Record.
I've found one that could be a coincidence, but with all the other easter eggs I'm inclined to believe it's on purpose: In the puppet shop in Prague there is a plane being built in the back room, its yellow with a black underbelly, with a checkered flag and plastered with the name "The Hawk," all of which happen to be pretty similar to the Pilotwings 64 character Hawk, who flies a yellow and black gyrocopter with a checkered flag for a tail fin.
I'd agree... if the list of missing features wasn't absurdly long and we were shown content that wasn't going to be in the game just a few months prior to release.
Dude clearly mislead and rode the hype train to cash in on preorder numbers and gullible customers, simple as that.
That's why everyone I know quit.
Man every time some hyped piece of shit has a beta/demo/tech demo/etc and it sucks you always have these people come out of the woodwork crying "its just a beta they can fix it!"
... And they never fix it. Ever.
Every Mans CE-34979-0
I just wanted to be able to see my friend. Even if we had to book it to the center and fly to one system to the side of it in order to finally meet up.
"I just ate dinner, so starvation must not exist anywhere".
I wouldn't call a game that crashes every few hours and is missing features advertised as simply "flawed."
Konami gonna Konami.
I don't see how a game that has constant crashing issues and blatantly lied in advertisements, on top of the rest of the issues the game has, is getting anything higher than a 2/5, but I guess I just have standards.
The demo sucked and the E3 showing was sad. Its a good thing they wasted development time on that stupid VR thing that no one wanted or asked for though.
You only need to repair two things in order to continue to hunt, and you can break down all the upgrades of your current ship and the crashed ship for spare resources. At most you'll need to grab some plutonium for fuel.
You are guaranteed to find a ship that is -2/+2 your current ship, so you just work your way up to 48 gaining +1/+2 at a time. The only two things you have to repair are the launcher and the pulse drive in order to use the ship to find another ship.
And 800k a run is pittance. You'll be doing somewhere around 75 runs to that ship in order to afford a 48 slot ship, if you even see one for sale.
You have to grind the crash sites. Crashed ships have -2/+2 slots in comparison to your ship, so you either have to buy a ship with a lot of slots and then work your way up, hopping from +2 ship to +2 ship, or start at the bottom and spend less cash but grind ships waaaaaaay longer. Honestly, it's probably easier to planet-hop until you find a planet littered in rare crafting unstackables, glitch them into a stack, then buy a ship with around 35 slots and start the crash site grind from t...
Why is it that the common reply of someone who doesn't like the game is always "Well go play X game then, casual." X being Cawadoody or some Ubisoft yearly release. It adds nothing to the conversation and makes you look like an elitist fanboy. Stop it.
I don't know what world you live in where "run into another person" can also mean "occupy the same space but not be able to see or meet a person," but it's not the real world.