Both taste good, just depends on your preference. Did anyone really believe the PS3 would turn out 3 times as powerful? 4D gaming at 120 FPS? They are about equal overall. While the PS3 may have a potentially moe pwerful CPU, the 360 makes up for with the slick GPU. These screenies prove it.
Keyser- that first-gen excuse for the PS3 is BS. The developers had an extra 8 months with the delay. This allowed the PS3 to hit the ground running and have games comparable to the 360's ...
Hey, we all have our opinions. Sony had a chance to one-up MS, but the eye toy has the same specs. That's all I'm saying. Both let you mess with the video feed with filters and special effects. A while ago there was rumors of extra features, such as infrared sensing for accurate motion and depth recognition. What happened there? So if the sales for the PS2 eye toy are any indication, only a small percentage of users actually purchased and use one. Why is everyone so emotional over something y...
The game was unforgiving on the original xbox. Precise control was required to survive. It seems harder to control not even fighting, but running around the levels. Running on walls, wall jumping, ect. The game is stunning visually, but if they do not tweak the controls this game will be ruined. Otherwise, I would purchase this game, as it would be the definitive version of the game.
Sigma is harder to play on the PS3 control-wise. At least on the demo. I hope they don't loose their quality standards when spreading thin on multiple systems. They already uglied their reputation enough with DOAX2 last year.
This was Sony's chance to one-up vision, and they did not. Sony should not get into the multimedia content, leave that to microsoft. Besides, Home is going to be a spectacular flop and a waste of millions.
The fanboys will never realize the truth. Same as the reference I posted the other day.
http://arstechnica.com/news...
Hardware dictates software sales, and HD-DVD is winning 3 to 1. Not that I am not enjoying Casino Royale and other Blu-Ray exclusive movies on my PS3, but they will be out on HD-DVD by the end of the year if the Wal-Ma...
Entertaining and brainwashing propaganda.
MUST...HAVE...BLU-RAY
Enjoy before Wal-Mart dictates the future of HD.
These numbers truly do not matter yet. Both formats are a fraction of DVD sales. The trend to watch is dedicated player sales, which HD-DVD leads 3 to 1. Blu-Ray's movie sales factor in PS3 owners and a flood of new releases. But gamers make up only a small percentage of overall movie consumers. Compare UMD sales to DVD sales for an example of this. The PS3 helps the numbers look good now becuase both formats are so new, but not in the longrun. You cannot win a film format war with a video ga...
Most likely speculation about the update as T-Virus stated. Most likely old BS rumors. Would be nice though.
My interest in consumer electronics goes beyond video games, and always has. As I am almost thirty and going back to college to finish my degree, many of my research papers have a consumer electronics theme. This allows me to get all the facts while I write papers, and draw from personal experience.
That's why I see the parallel between Blu-Ray and UMD. Both formats had a hugely successful start. Both formats cater to gamers who enjoy movies, which most of us do. After the game...
What could be sexier than an angry banana?
Dedicated HD-DVD players out-sell Blu-Ray 4 to 1.
http://arstechnica.com/news...
Coupled with dropping prices on HD-DVD players, the ratio will increase.
The ratio does not include PS3, 360 add-on or PC drives. The PS3 may be the only weapon left on the Blu-Ray side. By the time Blu-Ray players drop to $500, HD-DVD will ...
The war is far from over. All you people calling it for Blu-Ray probably only have a PS3. Blu Ray couls turn out to be the UMD for the PS3, while HD-DVD caters to home theater buffs. Face it, HD-DVD is still outselling Blu Ray set top boxes, and will conitunue to do so as price drops. And no, I am not a 360 fanboy. I have both formats. My family still gives the picture quality edge to HD-DVD. As for sound, how many of you actually have a reciever that can decode the nex-gen audio formats? ...
This game looks fantastic. A breath of fresh air after the pathetic GT:HD on PS3. Only if I could go crazy upgrading a 2005 Hyundai Accent. That would be the beeeeeeeeeeest!
It's pretty ugly. Perhaps I am spoiled from the next-gen offerings of the 360 and PS3, but I expect better, especially after Crysis.
Oh no Blackmoses! You know it's true girlfriend. Everyone is a money whore. Too much money to be made on the 360 to not do ports.
What is sad is the install base of actual Blu Ray hardware besides the PS3. How can a video game machine determine a movie standard? Will serious home theater consumers buy a PS3 to watch movies? I don't think so. HD-DVD has a 85% market share in Europe. HD-DVD will continue to push the set top hardware and outpace Blu-Ray players due to pirce alone. A $600 from Sony in the summer will meet a $300 Toshiba model. I have both formats because of the exclusive studios. In fact, that was a major m...
It is getting crazy each new generation. I remember the good old days when we just needed to buy a second controller. I have spent more money on accessories than I care to this generation.
360: Quick-charge kit, second controller, extra battery, HD-DVD drive w/remote, and a carbon fiber faceplate.
Wii: I refuse to spend any additional money on the piece of crap until some good games come out.
PS3: Had to get a component video cable (crappy move Son...
Do not approve this flame-bait! We have enough wars in every other thread.
Maybe the original xbox version was too good. The upgrades in graphics are not as impressive as I was expecting. I aslo find the xbox controller better for this game than the dualshock. Any Sony fanboy should buy this game at once. But if you've played it on xbox or the 360 BC, the difference is minor and not worth another $60.