As someone who likes halo and starfox 64, I wholeheartedly agree with the both of you.
Videogames are awesome.
Kids, in an effort to appear more mature (some adults, too) have kind of always distanced themselves from Nintendo once they hit a certain age.
And if Nintendo ever did crash, you can bet it will be pretty nasty, and the only thing coming out of them will be Mario. Remember Sega?
Exactly.
I think it depends on the person, and obviously, the type of game you are trying to make.
In most games, I couldn't care less about how immersed I am. I just like to play well designed, fun games. But that isn't always the case, so like I said, it all depends.
That was just plain awful.
Nintendo is doing fine. They could be better, but they certainly aren't in as much trouble as you are trying to say.
Both are different from each other.
That disagree isn't me, by the way.
Elite beat agents was a standalone western version of osu! Tatake! Ouenden (which did have a sequel), and never had a sequel because it sold so poorly.
It is progress, until that one all inclusive device breaks and/or its network goes offline.
Edit: ok, mr/mrs disagree, if the only video game console on earth was a ps3 during the hack attack, and you wanted to play an online game, what would you do?
If you drop your PlayStation portable or ds and break it, what handheld are you going to play while it is being repaired?
Why would someone willfully give away free choice for ease of use and the "privilege...
They aren't losing money per system, they are making less compared to the old price, which they based their forecast on, not selling enough and causing the price drop.
They lost potential money they wrongly expected to make, which in a multinational corporation, is the same as a "loss".
To my understanding, the loss has more to do with high expectations not being filled than an outright loss of money.
They didn't make as much as they forecast. The loss on each system is similar, as well. They aren't losing money on each console sold, but making less money than they would have if it sold the same with the old price point, as they incorrectly forecast.
I have no opinion, having not played it. I'm simply commenting on Kotaku's stories.
In the opener for the battlefield story, the Kotaku writer said:
"Battlefield 3's multiplayer is as good as its single-player campaign is bad."
"Is battlefield good? Yes.* Should you buy it? Yes."
"Is kirby good? Yes. Should you buy it? No**."
* Eccept the single player campaign, which is horrible.
** Because we don't like Nintendo.
That's what I'm getting from the last two stories posted on n4g from Kotaku.
Why disagree with rationality?
...is that you, kotaku?
This would actually be upsetting if it were anybody but kotaku.
Kirby looks to be a great game. Don't let kotaku be a deciding factor on wether or not to purchase it.
Exactly.
Well said. , blueshirt.
Nintendo isn't making it. Hori is.
Lol, I can see that.
But I have played alot of current gen games (mostly xbox, sometimes pc. I don't think I've played any PlayStation games with bugs that I noticed) that have had bugs, while I haven't noticed many or any in the types of games I listed above (psp, ds, and wii)
It may just be personal experience, but it was just something I happened to notice.
Edit
A man who opens his eyes and closes his mouth?
Wise.
Also, I didn...
Silly gamear, maybe he is noticing something that you don't?
It looks to me that you are both being closed minded.
"An angry man opens his mouth and closes his eyes."
That there is no such thing as a glitch free game is true, but I remember a time that you could own a game and play it over and over and never encounter a single bug or glitch, and if you ever did, it was quite a big deal. ("Woah, what the hell!!?? I've got to tell someone about this!", would be the usual reaction. )
Although, I don't experience glitches and bugs very often in handheld and Nintendo games,
which seem to be the only places where such t...
Awesome.