The game had only a few faults, all of which can and I hope will be addressed when/if a sequel arrives.
It had too small a roster of car bodies, defusing mines is boring as hell, the vehicle controls could have been better, cars haven't got a handbrake which would have been very, very useful and the characters could have been developed more as well as the story. But the biggest gripe I have with it is that it has no New Game +.
Also, the Interceptor i...
I think you meant neutralized.
It would be one of the best shooters of the year if it had a full single player campaign as was planned when it was known as R6 Patriots.
Other than that, I'm enjoying it. It doesn't run horribly like most Ubisoft games do on PC and it looks pretty IMO. R6 Vegas 2 still takes the cake, though.
It's safe to say it's not going to look that good when it launches. Also, hopefully they'll fix the engine for PC because it seriously relies only on one core, and that's not good for performance.
I kind of believe that beating someone or something to death with a stone is violent moreso than shooting someone in the head.
I seriously hope one of them is Mad Max 2. The first one had huge potential and is an amazing game.
As much as I'd like this to be true, it so isn't.
Plus, I already forgot about Gears of War Ultimate PC. Have there been any news about it?
When did they announce DX12 support?
Interesting, AMD does have a tendency to release drivers with remarkable gains now and then.
Curious how Nvidia will respond.
Well of course it does with a setup like that.
They shouldn't have done this, especially because they got caught bribing youtubers to say nice things about Battlefield 4.
Sometimes, brainless action is good.
The Ultra High preset is taxing as hell.
On my stock 970 the game started just fine in the intro level, 60-80fps inside the factory with FXAA, but as soon as the doors to the outside opened, BAM, 30-35fps.
Turned HBAO+ Ultra to just HBAO+ and PCSS Ultra to just PCSS and voila, instant 20fps boost. They actually did an okay job for once. Didn't go into the nitty-gritty (CPU, GPU usage), but performance is better than expected, to be honest.
It should have released simultaneously on all platforms, only then would it have a chance. With such a fragmented release schedule it'll never do well, especially on PS4 (I mean, to release a year later?).
I'm actually looking forward to it on PC because I don't need Fallout 4 now, with the Witcher 3 taking most of my time and ROTR looks like something I can squeeze in between college obligations and the wonder that is the Witcher 3.
You missed the point of both my comment and the benchmark itself.
This doesn't say Fallout 4 benchmarked (which would imply both CPU and GPU benchmarks), this doesn't say Fallout 4 CPU benchmark, this one explicitly tests how each GPU is handling Fallout 4 and ONLY GPUs.
Of course certain systems will bottleneck the GPU, heck, I'm running into bottlenecks more often nowadays and I have an i5 3570k @ 4.2GHz. But this wasn't the point of the bench.
Out of curiosity, do you consider those requirements high or low?
There are better models of the 970 out there.
Everything or nothing is the best Bond game to date.
You should.
Best of luck.