They've announced it's coming out later this year.
You can also play the zombies in multiplayer. It's loosely based off the popular zombie mod for Counterstrike.
Valve don't make no junk.
Valve is one of my favorite devs ever from back in my PC gaming days (remember when PC games looked far superior to console games?) and I think I speak for a lot of people. Valve is one of the most critically acclimed devs ever also.
When left 4 dead comes out later this year we shall see. Those grapes are looking mighty sour.
sorry, not going to spend $460 so I can play MGS4 when I already have a better console. they can port it to the 360 or lose a sale.
yeah, both killzone and resistance look so 2006. I cannot wait until these games come out. I knew Haze would flop (and got flamed to hell by Sony fanboys for saying so) and I know these two titles will follow in Haze's footsteps. Sony just can't make a good FPS. sucks to be a PS3 fanboy, I guess.
you can tell they're just seething with jealousy over GeOW 2 and they know it will win GOTY, stealing it from their beloved Mexican soap opera, MGS4.
stop drinking and posting
mgs4 looks crappy compared to GeOW 2. GeOW 2 has lighting and depth that I've never seen before in a game.
MGS4 is more comparable to GeOW 1 in that it lacks realistic lighting, has an extremely limited color palette, and has flat, non-dynamic textures.
man, you guys need to get a life. I guess they all finished mgs4 and now have no games to play again.
So you've pretty much seen into the future and played these games and decided that the x360 list is "mostly filler." Damn. I guees the PS3 is so super awesome that it doubles as a time machine. Was that the firmware update 3.56764?
You Sony lovers don't admit anything and that is why Sony has you by the balls, because they can constantly string you along with empty promises and a AAA title every couple years and you still come lapping back for more like a loyal puppy....
You're delusional.
The main reason is that games are expensive to develop and the PS3 is more difficult and time consuming to program for than the Xbox 360. Also, the 360 has approximately one third more of a console base (about 6 million). So developers are chosing the 360 because it's easier and cheaper to develop for and has a larger console base with a higher attach rate. It's basically a cost/benefit business decision on their part.
That's a rumor started by a PS3 magazine not an announcement from the developer.
Read the thread below the article. If you know an announced, named exclusive for either console then post it and I'm sure the author will add it to the list. He will not however post rumors or Japanese only titles or titles that have been dormant for excess of 10 years like Duke Nukem.
People try to dispute the list by naming a couple rumored games and the author states:
He is only listing confirmed, announced exclusives and not rumors. If you can find a game that is not on that list and is a confirmed, officially announced exclusive then post it on the thread and I'm sure he will gladly add it to the list.
Until then stfu with Sony BS and walls of text to hide the fact you bought a 3rd place console with a weak game selection.
that list is is severely dated. I would guess 2006, maybe 2007. you also list a bunch of rumored unannounced projects that never came to fruition and in the upcoming titles there are a bunch of games that have already been released (haze, gran turismo prologue, singstar).
It's also funny to see a bunch of games listed as 2008 titles that are not coming out in 2008! You're hurting Sony's credibility more than helping them with that list. especially if yoy list Star Ocean as an u...
yep. unless it gets really bad reviews.
that would be awesome.
mass effect got great reviews. metascore of 91.
Show me the link to the Microsoft statement that they are no longer improving XBL or adding features altogether. That statement sounds COMPLETELY ludicrious. I bet you just made it up.
As for, PSN measuring up to XBL when the 2.4 update drops: like I said, I've already seen on this thread alone people requesting features for PSN that are already on XBL and are not scheduled for 2.4. So how can 2.4 make PSN X-box Live's equal when there are still numerous features missing? Not ...
Trust me.
do we have to wait while they polish up the PS3 version?