Pretty sure it wasn't pre-rendered, however doing that kind of graphical fidelity in let's say an open area probably isn't really possible on the ps4, not right now anyway!
I'm no fanboy, what's right is right that's it! You though are obviously a fanboy - calling other competitors "sub par" even though ATI/AMD have held the performance crown just as many times if not more than nvidia... jerk.
a few cents in China lul.
Yea, cause Nvidia have never re-branded? OH WAIT
8800GT->GT9800->GTS240
Yes, three times for one card..
Then that's sorted! It seems like PS4 went with this architecture due to low energy consumption
"Its unique that they say Jaguar has 4 cores when the PS4 will have 8-cores in its version of Jaguar. Maybe its a single modified CPU, maybe its two processors together."
Lol, isn't the Jaguar based on the Bulldozer architecture? If I'm right about that it only has 4 "modules" with 8 "cores" on it.
The PS3 has always been stronger in Europe
I think that reference went over the heads of some of your commentators -_-
What the heck are you talking about? The PS4 got a Blu-ray player -_-
This stupid backwardness of some gamers is just sad. There's literally only good things about technological advancement, the expanded digital market. I've never been able to buy my games with such ease, it's always updated and accessible - I'm talking of course about Steam. The advantage the PS4 have over Steam seem to be the instant play ability, something that can't be matched. I can&...
x86-64 is what all modern PCs uses today... How is that not only a good thing from every point of view?
The obvious advantage with using a PC architecture is with what ease developers will be able to code for it, it doesn't have any disadvantages over the Cell, and as already stated, every single PC in the world have been using this architecture for decades now and it's still standard in every tier. So what the heck do you mean?
@kevnb
If you actually knew anything about anything you'd know that what we saw today in the killzone demo is nothing we'd ever seen before, the technical achievement of rendering that world is astonishing and Crysis 2 doesn't even come close. I'm not saying it wasn't possible on PCs before, cause it was I'm just saying no one has crafted anything like it for PC before.
I was utterly impressed of the technical side of the demo, the 3D ...
The important and interesting fact about the memory is that it's GDDR5, that is way fast, it doesn't matter if nextbox got 16GBs of RAM if it's only DDR3 it'll get its ass handed to it. I am truly impressed with the memory capabilities of the PS4, I got a 1500$ computer but not even that can match the memory speeds in the PS4 (though obviously I got a better CPU and GPU but still, impressive)
lol, you're even an insult to retards.
The piracy aspect of PC gaming and how it hinders developer from releasing games on this platform is extremely exaggerated. Good games always sell, even on PC.
I'll let all of you console fanboys in on a little secret; There's actually PC games that show how far ahead the platform is. Look at a game from let's say the Total War series. Shogun 2 is a beautiful game with thousands of fully animated soldiers with detail to match FPS's on consoles, that's some...
Wow, whether you can do a 180 in a certain speed is up to the games design not the input method.. A mouse and keyboard is just as immersive as a controller if not more.
There's just so many wrongs with the immersion arguments that are being thrown around here, especially that the stick would have an advantage in this field, this can't be more wrong;
I think many people in here when they're talking about this probably mean games like COD and games...
@BanBrother
You really believe 5 million people pirated The Witcher 2 cause the developer said so? That would mean that it got pirated 500% more than it got bought which is idiotic. Where would they get that number to begin with? Seriously start applying some critical thinking to that brain of yours.
The notion of piracy as a problem is widely over exaggerated by the industry. If a game is good it will sell, the PC gaming market is generally more mature than ...
@Starfox17
Well I'm not talking about GPU memory, I'm talking about the system memory in general.
PS3 have always been bigger than the 360 in Europe.
DDR3 is slow compared to DDR5, I have yet to see a game who utilize more than a couple of gigabytes of RAM, the time it takes to move data is way more important than actual space. Much of the backlash on Wii U came from the fact that the ram was DDR3, which is about half the speed of the DDR5 (the number at the end is a multiplier - 3x vs 5x)(G)DDR5 is only used in graphic cards on PCs today out of cost mostly, 8GB of DDR5 memory would be very expensive but gfxcards need the shuffling speed f...
You really found a CPU which was bad for gaming when barely any games are CPU heavy?! AMD has made lots of high end CPUs which can run any game at any settings, if you buy budget models that's your problem. I've mostly had AMDs along the years, and they were always satisfying, my latest though is an Sandy Bridge from intel (i7), it's also great.