That would be the dream, based on the progress, I expect this kind of graphic on a Nintendo console by 2035
Can we ignore this article and don't start a fight for it?
I like the concept, I just don't like playing console/desktop games on tiny screens, including the Switch.
Dedicated mobile devices like Vita or DS are fine though, because those games are designed from the ground up to be played on a small screen.
I don't get why people compare PS Plus to GamePass, it is not even the same thing.
Compare it to XBox Live.
I remember when I was enjoy plants vs zombie back in the day,
Now my son plays it too, just constantly annoyed by ads
PvZ 2 was total crap as well, just adding stupid super attacks to everything and makes you draw with premium currency
A nice little indie dev that was creating fun unique mobile games, once acquired did nothing new... they just bought them for the license so they can make merchandise and FPS.
What abou...
Control and FF7R made the whole year worthwhile already, the other 34 games are just icing on top.
No, he is talking about the service that give out AAA for $1/month because the company has no confident that they can make more money from selling them at regular price.
I don't get your thinking, what exactly would Sony gains/loses from not letting you to use gen 3 if it actually work? Not everything is an evil scheme. It would be a shame to design a console around crazy SSD speed and then let everyone use gen 3 tech and then complain it doesn't work.
He complains literally every single thing that Sony does.
Aren't you tired to come to all Sony articles that you obvious don't care, and just say some random shit without common sense?
How can a single player expansion detach from the campaign? It expands the story in Act 2.
And then online mode getting standalone so people who just want MP can play without getting the whole game. I didn't see you complain when Halo MP is standalone and free to play.
I have only played Witcher 3 once and I have met him, I don't think it is rare at all.
Just chill gamers, this gen barely started.
Games wise, is it exactly the same as getting both separately from the eshop right now? I know you get some extra soundtracks and cards from this bundle.
Disagreed for PC this, PC that. Agree about EA.
To me, Switch (I hate it though) still makes more sense than a Steam Deck to me. Usually on the go, I just want to do some light gaming, with quick resume (will see how well Steam Deck does, I would say a bad implementation can kill the device off). These lighter simple games are what Nintendo best, for games that I would want to run on Steam Deck, would be AAA titles, which are more often than not a frustration to play on a 720p screen with a thumb touch pad, I simply don't have the conc...
@Taero
If there is a piece of furniture, or a t-shirt that I really really like and I am afraid that one day they will break and I can't have them anymore, do you know what I would have to do? Buy multiple of them, why would it be any different for video games?
It is a good strategy, it is a new and unproven product, so they didn't even give you time to think, they announce it and you can either pre-order the next day or you have to wait a year before you get your product.
Both me and my brother almost bought it, but decided not to at the end, we just don't play enough PC games to justify it, and when we do, we would prefer to play on our desk with a big monitor.
And I can see that other than some action...
but if a game is enjoyable, wouldn't you want it to last longer, afterall, we "play" games, you get the enjoyment while you are playing it. Unless a game is not fun and you simply don't enjoy playing anymore, then I agree shorter is better.
Anyways, I agree with what you said, we need both short and long games, just sharing my point of view.
I have no idea what they are trying to achieve with all these weird marketing anymore.