I look how you tried to disguise your little troll there. You failed to mention the fact that even while being the most expensive console on the market, Ps3 has consistently outsold xbox360 since 2008. I know xbox360 sold more worldwide in 2011. As long as Sony continues to support share new tech within their first party studios, I'm fine with buying a ps4.
ps3 has only recently become available in China. I just hope they Stick with Nvidia giving all they want to do with 4k and 3d.
with the market to itself so your point actually works against you seeing as how it's been passed by Nintendo in 2009. Also people are forgetting that North America only had an allocation of about 300k-400k being available. We aren't tracking Canada or Latin America's numbers either.
http://www.examiner.com/art...
If you ...
that most of these launch titles are just ports. Which in fact says alot. There is little to no code optimization for the Wii U and it still manages to look this good. I remember when every bot was saying the 360 had better graphics than ps3. But it wasn't until people started actually coding for ps3 did we really see how wrong they were. Devs show off the power of a console, not the specs.
How about you try reading my entire statement before you go on a rampage. The is all about lazy developers nothing else. Wii U and XBox360 have the same architecture so there not really an excuse. Instead of optimizing Black Ops for the WiiU they just did a straight port of the 360 version. PS3 has low resolution but in Modern Warfare 3, both Xbox and ps3 has identical resolution. They're using Infinity Wards engine but Treyarch can't achieve the same results.
own both Xbox360 and ps3. But Treyarch only care about how the game runs on xbox360 and that's it.
instead of blaming the developer, people are accepting the excuse "the cpu is slow". That's bull and you know it. Look at all the Modern Warfare's done by Infinity Ward, they are identical on both systems. This is because they don't focus solely on one console. They develop for both system at the same time. Hardware limitation and consoles go hand and hand, this is nothing new to developers. What the WiiU got was a straight port from the Xbox360 without any kind of optim...
a fanboy and actually read the article. The Wii U version is on par with XBox360 visually, but frame rates dip into the 20's. Frame rate drops break the experience on the WiiU. So while the WiiU version might look better, the ps3 version runs the game at a more solid frame rate. But you missing the point, it's not the engine, it's the studio. MW3 was completely identical on both xbox360 and ps3 but it was because Infinity ward did it.
as I mostly agree with you accept for one fact. The Xbox360 has slight advantage over ps3 as far as RAM is concerned. Ps3 version actually performs better than the Wii U version but the Wii U version has greater detail. But you're completely right about the devs, their were lazy and mainly focused on one console. That's the difference between Treyarch and Infinity Ward. http://www.eurogam...
you're anti-Sony and everyone knows it. You commenting on speculated spec of a system not even announced yet. Why are you reacting negatively to an article about a developer who chose to share how they were able to program a game for ps3? So it's bad that a developer actually took the time to develop a game for the ps3 instead of just porting it? How many awards has 360 taken for best graphics? I distinctly remember GOD of War 3 (exclusive) winning it in 2009.
is superior on the 360. If that were the case then why would DICE lead console platform for BF3 be ps3? Also you narrow-minded way of thinking leads me to believe that you only own one console. You fail to mention the countless first party titles that look absolutely amazing on ps3, each one better than the last. Xbox360 only has Halo 4 and Gears 3. Spare us the whole "xbox360 and ps3 are equal in power" when almost every serious developers has claimed otherwise.
half an hour in Miiverse just looking at all the post. It's like Facebook+Twitter+Wii U. It's absolutely genius.
Believe me when I say it's not 3rd party support that really doesn't drives a console. It's really only first party support. Ps3 usually get the short end when it comes to multiplatform games but it's first party games are killers. People dismissed Wii as Gamecube 2.5 w/motion control (gimmick). But Nintendo is very innovative and tends to think outside the box the most out of all the big 3. I think people are jumping the gun like they did on the Wii. People buy consoles for t...
You can't simply look a a console as a PC. People were laughing at Sony's memory bandwith yet ps3 has some of the most visually stunning games this gen. Also XBox360 cpu isn't as fast as the Cell in ps3, but Halo 4 is graphically intense and maintains it's 30fps throughout the game. I just think this is the case of not enough manpower. Also it's not like it can't be done, this is just another case of market share developers. I think they're looking at the time and ...
early adopter kind of pays off. I bought a refurbished 60gig ps3 in 2007. It still works til this very day and I also keep my BC because at that time, EmotionEngine was built in. My theory is this, unless they have a incredible launch line up like WiiU (re-releases) then BC is a must. You want to wait until your library is substantial enough before removing it (i.e xbox360-ps3). It may not remain that way for the entire gen, but I can see being there at launch.
something in your argument. Do not downplay the fact that Microsoft had the entire current gen market to themselves for an entire year. It also didn't support RROD under warranty the first 9 months of 360s lifecycle. Contrary to your statement, the Playstation brand is only proving how strong it is. To overcome a year head start, high price point, biased media "doom" articles, and PSN hack only show how strong the name is. Like I said before, you can spin this however you want &...
That's when Sony made the announcement.They didn't announce their Q2 results until November 1st. Go do the math yourself. From April-Sept Sony sold 6.3 million PS3.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum...
They cannot add October because it's need to be for Sony's Q3 report. Microsoft announced their Q1 October 18th 2012. These reports are as of September 30th, just like Micr...
Clarification for those who are saying this whole month after Microsoft announced 70 million mark. Sony's Q2 is from July-Sept. All companies quarters end at the same time. Microsoft's Q1 is the same as Sony's Q2. PS3 has indeed surpasses Xbox360 in LTD. It's simple addition folks.
I'm a little skeptical about this. We all know the new video format has been approved by CEA (Consumer Electronic Association)UltraHD aka 4k. Sony already has a couple of 4k projectors on the market right now and plans on releasing it's 4k TV in the near future. I'm pretty sure they're planning on having the ps4 support the resolution with at least one or two games running at 30fps. I agree with you, I'm sure Sony's sticking with Nvidia on the GPU front.
we're going off of your logic, I guess my "Fanboyism" paid off because my Ps3 still has it's emotion Engine inside. So while everyone is buying HDremakes, I'm just buying the ps2 version for like $3.