"We don't want MS setting a precedent for others to use in the future and completely destroy gaming for gamers."
Stop this we stuff. You don't and will not speak on my behalf. Are you going to try and represent all the Steam users too? Get a hold of yourself.
"No it isn't. Stop pandering. You're not getting paid from MS."
See, another loud mouth ready to attack anyone who disagrees. Pathetic. Go act like th...
The reason why you can play offline on Steam is because you don't have a physical medium. It is still tied to your account and still needs to be authenticated in the beginning. What Microsoft is apparently doing is treating the physical medium like Steam does with digital goods and apparently it needs to verify the game which is why it needs a connection. It also alleviates all that data to be downloaded which may be an issue for many with data caps. I am saying apparently because there a...
GOG has all older titles. Why are games on Xbox Live and Playstation Network not DRM free? Why are Nintendo, Sony, Steam and Microsoft right and GOG wrong?
GOG has always been about no DRM. They have their userbase, as does Steam, Xbox Live, Playstation Network and Nintendo Network. Out of all of those only GOG offers DRM free games.
You sound like an extremest, "you're either with us or against us."
"Your shrimp and fish analogy is stupid, frankly speaking. Your willingness to ignore any information readily available to you is pathetic."
Why is it wrong? If a vegetarian doesn't eat meat you think they will join a discussion panel full or carnivores? No, they will join a discussion of diets and recipes that are non-meat products.
You see, that's what normal people do. They join discussion forums to share the same interests. They don'...
This is just stupid. It's no wonder they think gamers are insecure, irrational, and immature. That's how they treat us. I've seen better treasure hunts on the back of a cereal box.
The Last Guardian, along with an actual release date.
168 comments (and counting) over a review that should be ignored. My oh my this place is just hilarious.
I have a question, why do people care so much? They act like they have been totally offended because one game got a lower than average score. Like this is headline news at 6.
Relax people, this game has gotten top reviews across the board. None of you had anything to do with the creation of this game so why take things so personal?
What does that have to do with the topic? Please take your personal issues elsewhere, thanks.
@Foxgod
"Games, all i care about when it comes to consoles.
Things that are complained about having nothing to do with games, so MS succeeded in launching it as a media device, considering how much people are complaining about media features."
Of course, and when the show is over at E3 I hope people do talk about games and not just ...
"Sony isn't the type to give a number and then not have most of that number on hand, when it comes to games."
Really?
http://ca.ign.com/articles/...
Sony is also the type to show games that are years away from ever being released or in some cases not at all (Agent).
I'm pretty sure Lara Croft's bust size didn't hurt sales.
That's pretty bad if true. I can see a deal with Spike TV but not with publishers and telling them they can't show PS4 games. That makes no sense at all. That would be scummy and highly highly doubtful. Having a deal with Spike TV is nothing out of the ordinary.
EDIT, that link below is only 1 second.
DragonKnight,
"I'll argue from a common sense "it's right in front of your face" point of view."
Good. Then you can see from a common sense point of view it's already happening. Why do you think single player games are getting outnumbered by multiplayer games now? Why do you think what used to be single player only games now have DLC and/or an online component attached to it? Why do you think they brought in online passes? Why ...
@DragonKnight
"People, it's not going to happen. FromSoft have already said they have no plans for Dark Souls 2 to be released on next gen consoles. And given MS' track record with Japan, there's no way they're going to get exclusive content for a Japanese game, especially given the looks of their console which, apparently, matters a lot to the Japanese audience."
You mean the same Xbox brand that didn't have Tekken, Resident Evi...
Interesting. Some people will actually defend trolling as long as it's the same platform they don't care about anyways while fighting tooth and nail against trolls that are going after systems they support. No need for double standards, trolling is trolling and this topic is about the Xbox controllers.
With that said the Xbox One controller looks to improve on the already great Xbox 360 controller. I want to try those new triggers out.
http://xbox.about.com/od/xb...
FFXI did not require a Gold membership to play. It doesn't matter anyways since you have no interest in the system which kind of begs the question why you keep posting in topics about the Xbox 360 or the Xbox One. I guess the answer will no doubt be because I can.
Naughty Dog has proven to be one of the best development teams this generation. Can't wait to see what they can do on the PS4.
Bioshock sold more on the Xbox 360, what's your point? There's no room for double standards and people over reacting just because Microsoft doing it.
Bioshock came out later on the PS3, it didn't stop Sony from getting exclusive content. Why wouldn't Microsoft want to continue to go after exclusive content, timed or otherwise? This has been going on for many years, they certainly aren't going to stop now. Until we have just one platform they will all do what it takes to be competitive.
They'll have to address it sooner or later. They may talk more during E3 or have a per-show. Either way well know before it is for sale to the public.
Larry Hryb already mentioned they need to be clearer so I doubt this is just to avoid it but you never know with Microsoft.
http://www.gamesthirst.com/...
David Jaffe responds.
NeoGAF user unbias:
"Because the 2nd hand market isn’t a simple “Person A sells X, Person B buys X”. It is fine(technically/morally) to want the money from used games, however to assume getting money from used games will actually increase a publisher/developers bo...