had stated that the rumored Final Fantasy IX remake is real and that it will retain the classic turn-based combat seen in the original.
I hope this is true, that's what I want from a remake. FF7R is actually really good, but not what I was looking for from the remake.
dragon ball, naruto had some pretty good ones although a lot of them are still fighters and I think there are plenty of games from lesser known animes that aren't that, but I haven't really kept up with anime so maybe I'm completely wrong.
I was being sarcastic, 99.9% of games sold on there are not from valve so there's not much they can do about it.
yes, let's give storefronts the power to decide over properties they don't own, sounds awesome
It's an IGN thing, not an xbox thing.
"The person who talked about it, Bruno Rodriguez, mentioned that this cheering and shouting wasn’t an exclusive thing just for Spencer, and this was something they were instructed to do regardless of the person being interviewed."
and all of you eat it up like cotton candy, very nice. Disgusting headline Excaliburps, maybe read the article.
obviously cause after AC 2 the ceo of ubi sat down with the team to have them come up with a list of places and eras to milk the franchise dry.
I don't think it's that unclear. The 1st party studios they have that they didn't recently acquire will just do what they're best at.
Jaffe created some amazing games, but let's be honest he's batshit crazy and I would never take his advice when it comes to running a business. PS has plenty of 3rd party (exclusives) to carry them on to their next 1st party games.
The games that all the studios are working on are all relatively far along for most studios I assume so it's pointless to change course for them regardless. Nothing to worry about.
kinda defeats the purpose of the word remake
the latest patch was actually really good, but in that state the game should've been released not patched. I might play again in a patch or 2 but I'm rather looking forward to Last Epoch's patch
game of the show
no the question is if the game will be good, not how ms's financials are doing.
multiplayer games are the highest grosing ones, I don't think this one will make the list though.
Sony almost exclusively has single player games, nothing wrong to get some mp games in there, although I wished the gameplay looked more appealing
I think you're confused with blue protocol. From what I can see it was revealed at gamescom last year
nvm it said reveal trailer there, but it was at least showcased at a sony event before that.
stop stroking their ps cock, death stranding 2 and wolverine sure looked ready.....
why are you comparing it to E3? that's not what they are going for with this show. If you are expecting an E3 like show, you will always be disappointed. They actually spend a lot more time on some of the games instead of just showing a trailer, though there were still plenty of those ofc. Honestly sounds like you didn't watch the show. Also got some release dates for some bigger games, Wukong, Kingdom Come 2 and I think the star wars title. Highlights for me were Tears of Metal and N...
wdym filler? just cause you only like big AAA titles, doesn't mean everyone else does. The sales of the indies proves it. At least they try to push the industry forward that isn't only focused around better graphics.
Corona happened, gaming industry blew up, they overhired and now we're seeing the result of it, that's also why the sales have declined.
this is not meant to be only be blockbuster titles, that's what the game award reveals are for. I thought it was actually a pretty damn good show, saw a lot of indie titles that I'm looking forward to play. Especially that new game from the creators of Gris, I think the title was Nema or something, game looked fantastic.
I haven't watched the footage but I assume they use the same engine as Spidey 2, makes sense they would just put a reskin in a part of that game to test things out, it makes no sense to build a completely new environment first just to test things, that gets added later.