Nadella is so obsessed with A.I. he is just tainting every Microsoft product with it. They should offload Xbox and sell it to someone else.
I guess the real question is how many compatibility issues will arise from their motherboard chipsets? also the selection of motherboards for AMD is more limited too. Which often limits what kind of form factor build you want. Last time around I avoided AMD due to their chipsets having horrid USB3 support with accessories. You tend not to see these kind of issues being talked about, it ends up just being games and synthetic benchmarks.
Championship Manager 2 on Amiga is the rarest.
Grim
Wait Microsoft stuffing up another collection? You must be kidding. Don't worry you can expect Microsoft to waste money on 100gb+ worth of updates over the next 10 years to put a fraction of it right. Sorry but I won't be buying any Microsoft products on PlayStation. It is simply a bad move to line Microsofts pockets with more money.
BAFTA scratching the back of a British developed game is what this looks like.
Console players like to collect physical media and accessories, PSVR2 poses a problem in that most of the library is digital and the biggest title people want it for is GT7 which is a live service game that will be turned off like GT6. So then you are left with a paper weight VR headset. Compare this to PSVR1 which had lots of physical games and will still be usable for years to come. Part of this is also down to most VR fans are Gen X and Millennials. They haven't catered for that market...
@Terry_B How is PS+ good value if for example I haven't been subscribed for 5 years, Then 5 years later I want to play a game I got on the service. I have to pay $100 or more whatever the price will be in the future, almost certainly higher. That isn't value at all having to pay a high access fee for an old 10 year old game. Nothing about game subscriptions make financial sense unless you can keep them in your library without having to constantly pay for it. That is how they make the ...
Will you still play it when they close the server down like GT6 and your headset is a paperweight, That is why I didn't invest in PSVR2.
We already know what is subjective, Valve entered the console space and didn't sell a lot. There is no moving goal posts or any of this dipping your toes in and out to try and protect them from bad numbers. It is what it is a flop.
People need to stop moving goal posts, 3.7 million is a flop for a handheld that was supposed to be financially subsidized by Steam purchases, it can't even play the latest games anymore and hasn't even had as long a life cycle as handhelds before it. I'd call this experiment an expensive failure for Valve.
As a company they should probably stop wasting money on concept products and focusing on making software which is what they do best and what makes them money.
The 1,000 people who will buy this will be happy playing the 1 game Valve released for it in a slightly higher resolution.
You didn't expect it because as usual the internet completely blows out of proportion the size of next gen PC gaming, Yes a lot of people have PC's but only a small amount play AAA games on them or can afford too. That is why console manufacturers are ok with PC releases.
Most comment sections on websites or platforms are represented by a vocal PC minority posing as a majority saying this is great or this is the best and constantly trying influence companies decisio...
Please don't post spam rumors (The Verge) to try and counter the more popular story on N4G that the Steam Deck has factually not sold well. Just makes you look worse than you already are.
They haven't even made their version of Theme Park yet. Two Point Hospital was pretty great. I wouldn't mind a Two Point Shopping Centre/Mall, even though they are a dying concept I think it would make a good game.
In the end this will just drive the capitalistic model to more drastic solutions in the long term, maximize profits and don't make any hardware at all and just sell people digital bits down an optic cable. Putting tariffs on a digital economy is far more difficult than a physical based product economy. In the end the consumer will lose even more.
Nadella is basically obsessed with two things, Cloud and A.I. support Microsoft at your peril. Problem with Microsoft is they get money no matter what they do, this is what happens with you have a stock market setup like a pyramid scheme and you just have investors putting peoples money into ETF's just to grow and grow without any relationship to company direction or performance.
What is the evidence for this other than 1 VR developers opinion? PSVR2, AVP, WMR have all stopped production not to mention countless other headset manufacturers have bowed out. Meta sales are flagging and Valve are pretty much nowhere. The remaining players are all interested in the latest shiny thing "AR Glasses", a far cry from what VR is.
All I hear are excuses from VR enthusiasts, But the reality is the patience and the consumers wallet is now empty with ove...
Can it generate someone better than Phil Spencer?
Not one shadow on any object looking at the trailer. lol