They objectively don't run well. Plenty of people enjoy them in spite of this, but I shouldn't have to use a high-end pc to get a slow-paced adventure game to run at a decent frame rate. I had one party member shoot another because the game stuttered so badly at a decision point and I didn't even get to pick a dialogue option. The dialogue choices are the key part of that game; if those parts run poorly, there's no point.
They should probably focus on making their games work.
A lot of people who have played the Killzone series see it that way, at least to a degree. Neither side is good per se, but the side you play for pushed the other side to that point.
I agree with the substance of your COD argument, but I don't understand the "butt hurt." It's a cheap insult that adds nothing to your point.
No, they will drop prices to make money when people stop buying the game for full price.
Also, the old Battlefront games don't have campaigns. It just isn't part of the series. I guess those games were out too long ago and most of this current crowd didn't play them.
With that complaint, it's not that you don't like this game, it's that you don't like the Battlefront series. Hypothetically, if I'm automatically going to hate on games with no multiplayer, there's really no point in my pointing out that I don't like every single Bethesda RPG; they would all be outside the preset criteria for games I'll let myself enjoy, so I'm not even really evaluating each one in any meaningful way.
I just don't get the expectation of single-player from Battlefront. The old ones didn't have it (just bots for practice on the multiplayer maps).
Granted, the old ones came out during an era when there were plenty of single-player focused Star Wars games coming out.
How is Tomb Raider doing against Fallout 4?
The first one was so much better.
@InTheZoneAC The only reason Socom is being requested is for the online.
Agreed, BF1 was far superior.
Not enough people on the COD servers for you?
Yeah I guess we found the people who like shoddy annualized games. These people probably think The Witcher needs to be more like Assassin's Creed.
Lol it's funny because I'm sure you'd also complain if they did annual releases.
Lol just because these are indie games doesn't mean they are bad. Are you really expecting them to discount Fallout 4 and Battlefront?
I love all the "no single player, no purchase people." Did you also skip Fallout 4 because it doesn't have multiplayer? It's pretty rare that a game is great at both.
There are valid complaints about the game (season pass price, lack of splitscreen and bots on the main modes), but "Battlefield Clone" is not one of them.
If they do allow people to change, it should cost a decent amount or be a one time only thing. It's so annoying on Steam with people constantly changing names.
I hear that. So many more great games on Vita, though 3DS has the single best game in my mind (Super Mario 3D Land). Although there's a good argument for P4G as well.