JEECE

Contributor
CRank: 5Score: 138150

I think it kind of proves my point that you have to admit how hard it is to do what Bethesda does that almost no one pulls it off. I mean, you have a handful of supposedly better games since 2010.

And let's be real about Kingdom Come; as impressive as it was that they actually pulled that off after starting off in crowdfunding, it doesn't run the greatest and it also has bugs like a Bethesda game.

Basically, if you want a polished, first person rp...

2327d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

This is a great point. Capcom of today to Capcom of mid-PS3 is a pretty significant difference, and it didn't look like it would improve this way.

2327d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Who needs Bethesda when so many other studios are putting out engaging First Person RPGs?

2327d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

What other dev makes a comparable Western, First person perspective RPG? It's telling that we've been complaining about Bethesda screwing up this entire gen, but it's not like they are being replaced. I mean, you've got Kingdom Come: Deliverance, a game that came out this week (Outer Worlds), and a game coming out in April of next year (Cyberpunk).

It's telling that everyone always resorts to a third-person action focused RPGs like Witcher or Horizon the...

2327d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Is it? Both games faced criticism, but the one that faced more criticism for its MTs sold worse, despite having more consoles to sell on. 33 million is a big number, but if it's much lower than expectations, using one of the biggest licenses in existence, EA won't be happy.

Think of it like movies. Solo made $390 million dollars, which is a lot of money in absolute terms, but it was less than anticipated for such a major franchise, that it was still considered a fai...

2328d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I know this looks bad, and like the partial boycott of BF:2 failed. However, there is a reason they are combining the two into one big number rather than splitting them (as they would if 2 surpassed 1 in sales, so they could emphasize the improvement).

BF (2015) clearly sold significantly better than the sequel. By January 2016 it sold 12 million and by may 2016, 14 million ( 2328d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Don't get me wrong, I loved BF:1, but people need to stop pretending it was radically different from BF:V in terms of being a live service. It may not have launched with MTs, but they were introduced into the game, and in both games the MTs were dumb cosmetics. Biggest difference is that DLC maps were free in BF:V, but you had to buy them in BF:1.

I understand people liked BF:1 better substantively, mostly because they didn't play BF:V due to the bad press, and the ...

2328d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

Sigh. Using shipped numbers for something like a console is a viable measurement, because the PS4s that are on store shelves are going to sell in the next few months. The same logic goes for a big game (i.e. if we see shipped numbers for Call of Duty in a few weeks, those will be reliable because the copies on shelves are going to keep selling).

Really the only scenario where shipped numbers aren't going to become sold-through numbers relatively quickly is when a game i...

2329d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

It's not even that. Fake outrage is when people who aren't actually upset pretend to be mad. This is a case of people who want to criticize fake outrage pretending that the fake outrage is happening about Death Stranding PC, but it isn't. No one cares.

2330d ago 7 agree1 disagreeView comment

Unlike some people on here, I don't hate the idea of an all-digital option. However, to make it worth it, I feel like it needs to be cheaper (as in, it should have already been 200, and the sale should be 149 or 175 or something), and they need to have additional discounts. As in, if your primary console (I use PS4 but I'm assuming XONE has some sort of similar system where you can use your games on multiple systems but one is designated as your main system) is an all-digital version,...

2332d ago 6 agree3 disagreeView comment

Putting aside all the MT issues, I never saw anyone identify a reason to play this game rather than just continuing to play wildlands (assuming you want to play Ghost Recon at all). I mean, the consensus seems to be that it's just a worse version of that game.

2334d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I think we all expected delay to be a key component of streaming-based gaming.

2336d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Price drops are "moot"? That's probably the most significant factor I mentioned. The more Nintendo cranks down the price in the upcoming years, the more people who already have a primary console will be willing to take a "sure, why not?" Attitude towards the switch as a side console (again, not freaking out about power because they already have a primary console for higher end stuff). It's actually crazy that they've had this much success keeping the price for ...

2338d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

The thing is, I don't think that many people strictly game on the Switch. I think that setting up as a side option, particularly with a staggered launch compared to the other manufacturers, is part of what has made switch so successful.

2338d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

You really think streaming to a smartphone can replace the Switch? Because it doesn't. People don't want to stream games (look at the reaction to Stadia). I just don't see how people can't see that it's a side console. People aren't buying it instead of PS4, they are buying it in addition to PS4, and I'm sure the same will be true for PS5.

2338d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment

Price drops+exclusives+handheld factor that can't be replicated on Sony/Microsoft consoles. It's surprising to me how many people on here are so invested in hating on switch in comparison to those systems when it clearly is doing a completely different thing.

2339d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

This goes to the opposite extreme. Is it somewhat overhyped because it is a Nintendo exclusive? Sure. If it had come out with a different title and different names for all the characters, etc on all three platforms, would it have gotten a lower score on average? Obviously. However, it's still a really good game, and obviously not the most overrated game of all time.

2339d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

I don't really understand why devs don't downgrade visuals as much as necessary prior to release to hit a locked frame rate of 30 (or 60, depending on the game). I'd at least like it as an option. At this point, all games look good enough that I'd rather just take the resolution/detail hit to have a solid frame rate.

2342d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

I definitely agree with you about GT from a numbers perspective (GT3 sold crazy numbers on PS2, especially, but most games in the series have sold well), but it didn't start a culture of sustained first party success in the same way Uncharted 2 arguably did.

2342d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Lol yeah and in the two years before it came out, about every few months there would be an article on here from some low tier site claiming that an insider had leaked an Xbox 360 version of the game, and my Xbox friends would gloat about it (though they naturally never touched Japanese games anyway) and then the article would get debunked a day or two later by Kojima.

2342d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment