You know what I love about this series?
About 3/4's of each game is comprised of the following mission structure:
a) Get to this guys place across the map.
b) Follow this guy around as he talks to you, ultimately telling you to go to
c) This other guy, back across the map, who you
d) See b... telling you to go to
e) Kill this guy who will be walking around in circles.
10/10! (IGN) 9.75/10! (Gamespot) 11/10!...
It was OK. I wasn't too impressed with the twist and I didn't feel it handled its themes too well either, but I had a good time overall. 13/20 for me, personally.
Would it be called Deep Down otherwise, barring the obvious double-meaning from its plot?
I'd say 2 is the best in the series, in general. But of course, opinions. Those pesky things.
Name em'.
Trolls capitalizing on recent controversies.
lol, 4 better than either 3 or 1. gtfo of here. Opinions are what they are, but 1 and 3 are objectively better games in every way. Even the GBA MGS game was better than 4.
Mirrors Edge... was not short. If it was, then you didn't get the full experience. You should have beaten the single player, then 5 starred all of the challenges. Otherwise, you only got half of the experience.
Sterling is a fat opinionated idiot. Sessler is a bald opinionated idiot. God hates both equally.
The best reviewers are on youtube, with a minor fanbase, thoroughly discussing each game. They love games, and that is why they do it.
The worst reviewers are these self-aggrandizing arseholes with a massive fanbase who feel like they're some sort of messianic figure in the industry. They've been polluting the industry since the early 2000s and ar...
This fat turd again?
Hahahahaha
Dark Souls. I felt like such a cheap bastard sword plunging the Capra Demon to death. Then I looked up a FAQ a few days later when dealing with Ornstein and friend and I see the plunge method was an acceptable means of killing the Capra Demon.
In a normal game that would be considered an exploit. In Dark Souls, merely a fitting solution.
I own and have played every Bethesda game back to and beyond the Terminator stuff. I buy them cheap, because I'm waiting for them to actually fulfill the potential of their series. Sadly, they seem more interested in making things larger and emptier than making any improvements.
My PC agrees.
Yes! I can't wait to explore 100 cut and paste dungeons populated by the same handful of enemies regardless of their location. I can't wait for an infinite number of randomly generated fetch quests. I can't wait for that realization 5 hours in that there really is no point to exploring in a Bethesda game, since every house is devoid of character, lore, or purpose.
Hey Bethesda, hire the guy who writes the one or two good quests in each of your games and fire th...
You're critical insight truly isn't hampered, but there are things your kind needs to correct.
Perhaps not you specifically, but nothing is more irritating than praise for false innovation. Bioshock was hailed as some kind of innovative messiah when there existed an entire backlog of games that did everything it did and more.
In the next review, say of Lords of Shadow, you will hate on all the things it does so damn well just because it plays like ...
Slender is effing stupid.
Blood Curse is just below Silent Hill 2 & 3 for me though.
So, essentially, an 8.5 is a mediocre experience to you?
Stop taking the dictionary's definition of a game and applying it as a defense of your opinion. If that's all you've got, then I'd just relabel games as "Interactive Entertainment", which is a much more fitting description but a larger mouthful.
Btw, Cage's games are the worst things out there because he's a terrible writer, not because of his gameplay. Case in point, The Walking Dead.
Except the cinematography is about on par with LoTR, which always has looked hokey and pitiful.
Ha! And companies continued to thumb their noses at space-sim fans for all these years. Your loss.