I totally agree. It's the first game that got me into watching eSports and I absolutely love it.
Now I'm watching LCS whenever I can.
Go NiP!
"I've never played a game that uses RAM before"
Well than you probably never played a game.
Seriously why are you here?
To be fair Sony has much more console exclusive games that are available on PC than Microsoft cause of all the indie games.
Most of these are horrible. I'm glad they'll stick with PS4.
In my opinion they don't need to compete with the PS4 and Xbox One in power however it means that they won't get a lot of 3rd party support again.
And I'm getting annoyed by statements like yours. You can't just gereralize different comments from different people and pretend that everyone has the same mindset.
Whoever thinks that the Wii-U is less powerful than the Xbox 360 or the PS3 in raw power is mistaken however Nintendo isn't exactly pushing the limits of their own hardware so we've yet to see what the console is capable of.
@darx: What does it have to do with sequels? Infamous is an open world super hero game. A type of game that is rarely done on the quality level of Infamous. Sucker Punch is always improving from game to game a lot so I expect a lot of new elements to the core of the genre.
Final Fantasy XV looks very fresh. You could consider every new FF game a new IP anyway cause the only thing they share is the name and the genre (except for X-2, XIII-2, XIII-3).
MGS V goe...
Yeah that's pretty much exactly what it means.
Only game I played from that list is Vagrant Story. I've started a new playthrough yesterday and it's still awesome.
Nice! I wanted to order mine as an US Import today. I guess now I'll wait for it.
Nice list. I still play some PSOne games from time to time. I've started a new game on Vagrant story yesterday and it's still awesome.
I agree that every platform has it's pros and cons. But you get a lot of value for the $50-60 a year. It's not like you're paying just to play online. It sucks that online play is behind the paywall though.
Gaming is not only about graphics. But if it helps to make the world more believable it's definately a good thing. There would be no point in getting a new console when the standards for a game stay the same. It's about the whole package of gameplay, graphics, soundtrack, acting, AI and so on.
Titanfall didn't really raise the bar for any of those with it's E3 presentation which gave it a feel of a current gen game to me. I'm not saying it'll be a bad ...
I don't get the hype for Titanfall at all. It looked generic to me. I'm not hating on it I just don't understand why everyone is so excited for it.
My most anticipated games of E3:
1. Infamous: Second Son
2. Final Fantasy XV
3. Knack
4. Watchdogs
5. Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain
It's a shame that there are no ports planned. I really hoped for it. I might pick them up for PC as soon as I build a new rig though.
Yeah like the PS3 version of Diablo 3 is missing that always online feature that made the PC version so much better. /s
They removed the camera? They didn't include the camera because it's not essential to the core experience of the PS4. If you want one you can go ahead and get one and it would still not cost you $500.
I for one am not planning on getting one any time soon. Others may want one. Maybe I'll decide to get one later on. It's called options. I like to have options.
Compared to some other publishers the quality of most EA games is pretty poor though.
@RyuCloudStrife: Most of the games late this gen look on par or even better than Titanfall. So that's not too impressive.
I agree that the Wii-U is a powerful console as of now. It's just not future proof in terms of power.
Take a break man. And stop typing with your iPhone until you have found out how to punctuate.