Man this level of salt is sad. MS had an amazing conference and they expanded their first party like every has been saying they need to. With absolutely outstanding studios.
If Sony had the same conference and/or acquisition it would be praised, and rightly so, because it was a good conference and extremely smart acquisition.
2929d ago 30 agree20 disagreeView commentInappropriate
The visuals improved, but only slightly, but those animations are absolutely amazing.
I agree 100% that any game or piece of media can have a slant. However, I think that means anyone has a right to criticize it also, or disagree with that slant/choice.
I haven't heard anyone suggest it should not be allowed or is a be banned, just dissenting opinions on the POV presented...
This article suggests that just because people are upset about a decision or dislike a decision, that that suddenly means they feel that means it has to be removed...
The h1z1 and arma mods were both by player unknown, just being honest. So saying they were first is actually just more supportive that he made this type of gameplay. I just don't think the argument that a game mode can be copyrighted.
I mean, king of the hill, TDM, horde modes, etc were all made by game companies first, and others implemented them, in many cases with many more similarities than Fortnite and PUBG, so I highly doubt this will fly in court.
That said, I kind of get the argument, but I think it is more representative of why PUBG needs to optimize their game and add modes and content to keep their game fresh than it is to say that others used similar gameplay and that hurt them.
"The old bubble system worked in a way to keep trolling down to a point."
No the bubble system allowed a small group to silence anyone whose opinion they didn't like while expanding the ability to post for those they agreed with.
"Many great people in the past would have been considered SJWs, MLK, Ghandi, etc."
Interesting, MLK said he wanted people to be judged on the content of their character NOT the color of ...
@gmqingunited "why can't they make the game they want?"
They can, and MOST (not all) who don't like it, just dislike it because it is not historically accurate, and seems like propaganda. (Personally, I don't care, just standing up for the right to the opinion that it is distasteful)
I have not seen anyone saying DICE, or any other dev, cannot add women to a war where they were not on the battlefield, just people that don't like ...
So basically, this article is along the lines of:
"I disagree with your opinion and am unable to argue your points with facts or reason, so mods need to ban you. Also, you are immoral for disagreeing..."
IMO I think that both sides can just argue the merits of their argument, and this site VERY frequently allows that, you just seem to be upset that the arguments you like are more often not as strong.
This article is a joke H1Z1 is one of the most broken glitch-filled games I have ever seen. Literally watched shroud play 6 games, every one he died from a glitch or hacker....
This article and all the comments are completely rediculous, state of decay is a pretty great game, IMO. Not saying it is a game everyone will love, but it is better than the original in every way and many considered it to be great, not sure what changed. (Actually, I am)
And before you guys all whine and call me some blind fanboy, literally last month I said MS lost it's chance to catchup to Sony and start releasing good software, when an article claimed it could. I ca...
Noone said it would be a bad game, just that the expectations for it are equivalent to what the game offers.
It looks fun and I and my friends plan to play it, and have no doubt it will be worth every penny of the $30.
That said, it most likely is not going to be a genre changing game, or a game of the year contender, just a fun game. Though, IDK why that is such an issue.
I agree with the first 10 words of this title, but mostly just because it would be a good practice for every console to adopt, and really helps out with games with smaller player bases.
I actually disagree, I think 2017 was their make or break year, they didn't "make" IMO and frankly I think there is really no way they make headspace in the market at this point and 2018 is just a matter of if they want to even remain relevant. Hopefully this E3 is great, but if it isn't, or relies SOLELY on Halo 6, I would be a bit concerned frankly.
@william resolution doesn't matter anymore to the people who claimed resolution was the epitome of gaming when PS4/XBO launched. Noone can see a difference now and graphics don't matter as long as it is the same game.
Where have you been?
2998d ago 11 agree1 disagreeView commentInappropriate
Skill is very relative, don't think earning it legitimately requires skill, this game in all requires very little skill.
Doesn't make it a good game though, SOT is decent at best, I personally think it is boring and lacks any actual content or diversity of gameplay.
3005d ago 22 agree1 disagreeView commentInappropriate
I always mention how the previous games were not good and had no depth in combat, and the people here never agree, at least this article tells me I am not alone, but as with this article, I think the new game looks absolutely stellar. I like that is looks more like the combat requires more planning and timing than the past games.
The visuals improved, but only slightly, but those animations are absolutely amazing.
I agree 100% that any game or piece of media can have a slant. However, I think that means anyone has a right to criticize it also, or disagree with that slant/choice.
I haven't heard anyone suggest it should not be allowed or is a be banned, just dissenting opinions on the POV presented...
This article suggests that just because people are upset about a decision or dislike a decision, that that suddenly means they feel that means it has to be removed...
The h1z1 and arma mods were both by player unknown, just being honest. So saying they were first is actually just more supportive that he made this type of gameplay. I just don't think the argument that a game mode can be copyrighted.
I mean, king of the hill, TDM, horde modes, etc were all made by game companies first, and others implemented them, in many cases with many more similarities than Fortnite and PUBG, so I highly doubt this will fly in court.
That said, I kind of get the argument, but I think it is more representative of why PUBG needs to optimize their game and add modes and content to keep their game fresh than it is to say that others used similar gameplay and that hurt them.
"The old bubble system worked in a way to keep trolling down to a point."
No the bubble system allowed a small group to silence anyone whose opinion they didn't like while expanding the ability to post for those they agreed with.
"Many great people in the past would have been considered SJWs, MLK, Ghandi, etc."
Interesting, MLK said he wanted people to be judged on the content of their character NOT the color of ...
@gmqingunited "why can't they make the game they want?"
They can, and MOST (not all) who don't like it, just dislike it because it is not historically accurate, and seems like propaganda. (Personally, I don't care, just standing up for the right to the opinion that it is distasteful)
I have not seen anyone saying DICE, or any other dev, cannot add women to a war where they were not on the battlefield, just people that don't like ...
disingenuous*
So basically, this article is along the lines of:
"I disagree with your opinion and am unable to argue your points with facts or reason, so mods need to ban you. Also, you are immoral for disagreeing..."
IMO I think that both sides can just argue the merits of their argument, and this site VERY frequently allows that, you just seem to be upset that the arguments you like are more often not as strong.
Obviously there are trolls and peopl...
.
This article is a joke H1Z1 is one of the most broken glitch-filled games I have ever seen. Literally watched shroud play 6 games, every one he died from a glitch or hacker....
This article and all the comments are completely rediculous, state of decay is a pretty great game, IMO. Not saying it is a game everyone will love, but it is better than the original in every way and many considered it to be great, not sure what changed. (Actually, I am)
And before you guys all whine and call me some blind fanboy, literally last month I said MS lost it's chance to catchup to Sony and start releasing good software, when an article claimed it could. I ca...
Noone said it would be a bad game, just that the expectations for it are equivalent to what the game offers.
It looks fun and I and my friends plan to play it, and have no doubt it will be worth every penny of the $30.
That said, it most likely is not going to be a genre changing game, or a game of the year contender, just a fun game. Though, IDK why that is such an issue.
I agree with the first 10 words of this title, but mostly just because it would be a good practice for every console to adopt, and really helps out with games with smaller player bases.
I actually disagree, I think 2017 was their make or break year, they didn't "make" IMO and frankly I think there is really no way they make headspace in the market at this point and 2018 is just a matter of if they want to even remain relevant. Hopefully this E3 is great, but if it isn't, or relies SOLELY on Halo 6, I would be a bit concerned frankly.
Skill is very relative, don't think earning it legitimately requires skill, this game in all requires very little skill.
Playstation plus absolutely killed it last month, (bloodbourne and ratchet and clank) but gotta give this one to GWG.
I always mention how the previous games were not good and had no depth in combat, and the people here never agree, at least this article tells me I am not alone, but as with this article, I think the new game looks absolutely stellar. I like that is looks more like the combat requires more planning and timing than the past games.