CRank: 5Score: 26690

I think you'll find that developers aren't impressed with the new consoles.

They've been saying for years they want more power, because the bandwidth simply isn't there to add things like new AI code.

This generation of consoles is the generation of sacrifice. If you want a massive world, you have poor graphics. Want great graphics? Small, disappointing world (hey Infamous).

It's one or the other this generation.
...

4287d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

Doesn't stop PS4 owners thinking The Order will look "as good as it does" on release.

Only console owners are adamant their games won't get downgraded. Which is wrong. Proven by almost every console game ever when compared to reveal footage.

"Oh but Infamous SS..."

Shut up. It has graphics we've had for years, and as a result pushed the PS4 so far that they had to make the map pathetically small and forgot ...

4287d ago 2 agree7 disagreeView comment

I find it pathetic that people think a game that gets anything below a 9 isn't worth getting.

7 is a good game. 8 is a great game. 9 is an amazing/fantastic game. 10 is a paid-off game. CoD is a paid-off game.

4287d ago 5 agree2 disagreeView comment

And yet Infamous was short with a pathetic map. And by the way, we've had Infamous's graphics for years.

It uses cheap tricks with the low sun and wet surfaces to make a game look prettier than it is.

In the day, Infamous looks terrible like Watch Dogs.

All the PS4's power went into the graphics, and as a result we had dull gameplay, too short of a game and only 1 power worth using, and some of the worst framerate deviation I thi...

4288d ago 5 agree19 disagreeView comment

There is hardly any difference for sure.

This is just a pretty poor engine design. Look at the PC. Obviously it looks best on PC, but the differences between low and high can KIND of be listed on one hand.

Lighting and shadows seem to be the biggest change.

PC has more AA settings like 2xMSAA that reduces jaggies during movement etc.

Also the PC version has larger draw distances and a better FPS, twice that of consoles.

4289d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yet another example of an engine that doesn't have much difference between the settings at all, yet console owners use it as an example of how close their dated hardware is to PCs.

Yeah, it's close in this bad example.

But you can only manage 30 FPS.

4289d ago 3 agree6 disagreeView comment

Go enjoy your dated Infamous and The Order then.

At 900p 30 FPS.

Consoles bloody suck.

4290d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

It's Halo.

You're doing nothing new in hour 7 than you are in minute 7.

Same enemies, same guns, only the environments change. Vehicle parts are nice but too few and far between.

Halo is arguably one of the most generic series of FPS games around. It does nothing new, never has and Destiny will be no different.

All Halo has ever done for the gaming world is matchmaking. That's it.

EVERYTHING ha...

4290d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

Because Intel and Nvidia walk all over AMD.

AMD's low, medium and higher ranged hardware fails to beat Intel and Nvidia in almost every model-equivalent they have.

What AMD IS good at is super-high end, close to £1000 CPUs and cards.

4290d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

ENB Series will change everything.

Look at Dark Souls 2 now with ENB. Looks like it did at reveal.

4290d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

I'll take 1080p and 60+ FPS on PC thanks.

If it helps, I'll be using my PS4 controller.

4290d ago 9 agree2 disagreeView comment

Yeah I'm sure the PS4's CPU will run the game better than a superior i7 CPU.

4290d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

*cough*

Steam.

Watch Dogs on Amazon? £44.99

Steam CD Key websites? £21.99

Sony and MS are just retarded if they think £54.99 for a download will be successful.

That's a higher price than GAME. And who the hell is dumb enough to buy from them?

4290d ago 6 agree0 disagreeView comment

And yet you can't see the difference between the clearly better PC version and the inferior PS4 version, because you're blind console fans?

Saying the PC version doesn't look better than the consoles is just pathetic trolling.

4290d ago 4 agree4 disagreeView comment

Typical console trolling crap on a PC article.

It looks better on PC. Get over it.

4290d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

Wet is the only reason Infamous looks even slightly good.

During the day, Infamous looks really bad.

Low sun and wet surfaces are just a trick to make you think the game looks better than it is.

Console owners flock to Infamous because they're desperate to beat PCs, and they still can't.

Infamous is okay looking at best.

4290d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

It doesn't.

That's why. SS has graphics we've had for a few years now.

4290d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

@Rowco147

This looks better than SS.

4290d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

Consoles are holding this game back.

4290d ago 4 agree10 disagreeView comment

Consoles are holding world sizes back.

Look at Infamous. Hilariously small map.

Thief? Loads of loading times and "areas". All because consoles can't handle a big open world.

4290d ago 1 agree9 disagreeView comment