There's already a fix for graphics on PC.
In the ini files, there's a line called "DefferedFXQuality=" console". Deleting that console crap and replacing it with "PC" changes the textures to a more PC standard.
Game looks better already, and the mods haven't even touched it yet.
ENB Series will be all over this game, just like Dark Souls 2, adding far better lighting, depth of field, all that jazzy effects etc. Dark Souls 2 on PC with some easily installed and basic mods looks as good as the reveal did already.
Trust me. Give it a month or 2 and the game on PC, modded, will look just as good as it did at reveal.
ENB mods are kind of like how a game should be on PC, before the engine gets downgraded so consoles can run it.
I love how delusional console owners in denial downvote the truth.
A mid level GPU DOES run the game on Ultra at 60 FPS, and the PS4 is confirmed to run on "high" settings at 30 FPS, 900p.
Sod of consolers. This is the simple fact.
N4G is full of childish console fanboys in denial.
What do you expect?
Try mentioning a PC around here without getting massive disagree votes, or some pathetic troll joke about PCs being more expensive or worse than consoles.
How the HELL are Sony on the right track at £50+ a game?
I can get the physical copy day of release for less than £40, free delivery from Amazon.
And £20 on PC through Steam keys. PC gaming is SO much cheaper. I pre-ordered Thief, Watch Dogs and Diablo 3 Reaper Of Souls all for <£23 each. £40 on consoles each. I'm getting 2-for-1 at that rate by being on PC.
Sony and Microsoft's pricing are more of a jo...
It's always been playable.
Oh wait, you mean on consoles.
You can watch almost the whole game on YouTube already.
Plenty of playthroughs already up.
Just on crappy consoles so the detail is laughable.
And you all say PC players are obsessed with graphics and resolutions and FPS figures.
Yet, here we are, with every new game coming out.
The re-mastered console version still looked worse overall (of Tomb Raider), even with the entirely new textures over the PC version.
Plenty of pics prove it.
Get close to the textures and the standard textures found on PC wins massively every time.
Console hypocrites. Look at you.
Blabbering on over which muddy version looks best. And you say all PC gamers care about is graphics?
Look at what you're arguing about in almost every article.
PC version of Watch Dogs looks the best, confirmed by the devs countless times and the Nvidia trailer for the game.
Get over it.
Last Light is easily one of the best FPS games of the last couple of years.
Genuinely scary and an atmosphere so thick you could...well, you have to wear a gas mask.
I loved the little touches like wiping your gas mask to clear your vision. Gunplay is solid. The game is challenging.
I liked it a lot.
It's id's RAGE engine.
Hardly demanding or even pretty.
Pop-in is plaguing the game, just like when RAGE came out.
GTA 5's map was empty and boring, and FAR too big for online.
"Will run at 60 FPS"
Pretty sure every dev has said this, and not one has delivered.
Marketing LIES.
The devs have said the PC version on Ultra not only runs well on a 670, but looks almost identical to the E3 reveal.
I can imagine the game is a blast in bursts of like a few rounds.
Much like CoD, it's just dull after a while.
LOL they recommended a GTX 780.
Yet again, specs are complete nonsense for PC games.
Sooner the better, but realistically when more consoles have sold so the investors get their money back through sales.
The PS4 has sold well for sure, but the games aren't.
Look at Infamous SS. All that hype, and yet it was out-sold by a Diablo 3 expansion on PC, in less time.
Infamous sold 2 mill in almost 10 days. Reaper Of Souls sold almost 3 mill in 7.
Ultimately though, STOP THE CROSS-GEN NOW. I don't want new...
Same as Sucker Punch with Infamous then.
Still looks miles better than consoles.