Infamous SS has "pretty" graphics we've had around for years to blind you from the dull gameplay, insultingly small map and laughably short story.
Strategy games don't work on consoles because the controls suck.
Evident by no strategy game EVER on consoles controlling well, or more to the point, selling well.
Of course you bloody can.
And 120hz (100+FPS) is even better, by a massive amount.
It's the difference between treacle and water.
Amazing how console gamers scoff the likes of Crysis, but throw Xbox into Crytek news and suddenly they produce the best looking games ever?
Console owners think Infamous is impressive, this looks better, so yeah.
Impressive.
The hardware in a PC to get 60+ FPS in today's open-world game isn't much.
People seriously, SERIOUSLY overestimate the power:cost ratio for PCs.
An £800 PC, BUILT ENTIRELY FROM SCRATCH (mouse, keyboard, case, EVERYTHING) can very, VERY easily run almost every game today at 60+ FPS.
It's been done. Look at Digital Foundry's findings.
Please stop assuming you need a £2000 PC to run today's games ...
I love how people think the game won't be downgraded by release.
More lies.
It will reach 60 for sure. Indoors.
Outside? It'll fluctuate like mad, LIKE EVERY OPEN WORLD GAME EVER.
Cut the BS and just tell us you can't maintain 60 FPS, before Eurogamer proves you're full of it.
Do people still need to be reminded that the engine dictates how graphically impressive a game can look?
So if you have an engine producing crap graphics, like for this game, the "ultra" PC settings, yeah, WILL look around the same as the console's version.
When the version look similar, it is not an indicator of hardware power.
It's an indicator of a lazy dev not pushing graphical fidelity in its' engine.
30 FPS is fine, for sure.
If you're stuck in the early 2000s.
Next-gen should be 60 FPS in every game. Any excuse is exactly that, and anything less should not be accepted at all.
I swear, if you guys actually see a game at 100+ FPS running on a 120hz monitor, 30 FPS would make you sick.
The problem is that MOST console owners don't know any different.
And don't give the "no difference betwe...
"Likely 1080p 60 FPS"
Yeah, like we haven't heard that about every game so far...
I predict a downgrade.
And I'll be sticking to the Dark Souls series. This and H1Z1 are just cashing in on another series' success.
You know, I understand newcomers buying this, but I don't understand the logic behind those that have played it already, maybe even platinumed it, BUYING IT AGAIN.
People were pissed at what "message" was being sent by MGSGZ being a "demo" (which turned out to not be the case as I got more hours out of the game than I did with Infamous for example), so what the hell kind of message does THIS release send?
"Don't give us anythi...
And only 30 FPS, which is "fine" apparently.
So much for "next gen" 60 FPS 1080p.
I must be the only person not interested at all in VR, as just like 3D, it's such a gimmick.
Price. Price. Price.
Lack of performance proven in every game so far. Hardware not as good as the cheaper competition. Xbox Live is a moot argument now as PSN is better value and runs just as well. The TV stuff is US only, or SKY in the UK that only a few million people have. Kinect is a gimmick.
Pay more for a console that will lag behind forever?
Pfft.
PC and PS4 thanks.
Considering how blatantly made for consoles the game is, I'm surprised at this.
Looks better than Infamous to be honest.
This umm...
This looks really rubbish.
Typical console moron response.
DayZ's Arma engine, the bugs etc, make the game unique and give players an EXPERIENCE unlike any other game.