You have no idea how many biological reactions took place and the myriad of chemical processes that were carried out between various cells in your body just so you could type that message.
Boggles the mind how the mind boggles.
Though I miss the simplistic intro's of the past...like moto racer. All it did was flash "F=ma" on the screen, following by two minutes of motorcycles and noise.
Real men don't look at explosions.
...but, when they have no other choice, they wear Call of Duty sunglasses.
Thats the thing on the back of the car, ain't it?
Any good racing game has spoilers.
Time to equip shotgun for stealing arms and legs of our poor opponents. Hmm.
... Hmm, indeed.
O.o
I wish I was cool enough to make my own opinions instead of relying on websites to tell me how good a game is based on a numeric value.
I don't want to buy this game because someone else has this game and their version has slightly better graphics.
/s
Why on earth would someone use a DS3 to play an FPS on a PC?
O.o
Not sure how analogue movement and pressure triggers are considered a plus... but you're right on the force feedback.
The increased resolution make up for it... sort of. =/
Anyways, they cater to different audiences. Console are better at action/adventure/racing... PCs have the edge in FPS/RTS/MMO-whatever.
Don't know why you'd put DeadSpace. It really hasn't brought anything new to the table. (DeadSpace2 will have to wait I guess)
I think the list only considers games that actually have a sequel released.
Vroom vroom.*click* vrrooooommm eeeckeeckeeckeeeckeeeck *thud*
Great, the video just spoiled the first five minutes of gameplay for me. =(
I'm loving how we're actually getting new maps this time.
PC exclusives is one thing.
Multiplatform games, on the other hand, are usually on the same visual level between consoles and PC.
So any game that sacrifces visuals for FPS on the consoles will look bad on the PC.
A game that settles for 30FPS (like BadCompany2) will look much better because the devs pushed some pixes and sacrificed the FPS.
Ofcourse, to a PC user, FPS doesn't matter... if anything, FPS below 60 means you need new hardware...
... and who decides whether a score is genuine or artificially-increased?
Seems if the score agrees with one's personal opinion, then it's genuine.
If the score is higher than one's opinion, then that means it got a free-pass.
If the score is lower than one's opinion, the reviewer is an idiot.
Reviews are just one guy's opinion. Treat it like any other opinion (except the reviewer, being an actual journalist hopefully, migh...
I though this was... on consoles?
The on-screen buttons seem to lead me believe in the latter.
Use LastStand, I guess.
Meh, all articles eventually boil down to my-parents-bought-me-a-better- game-system-than-your-parents *blows raspberry*
It's really quite similar to real-world politics, actually.
CoD2 was no slouch.
Or well, it was (and still is) enjoyable to play every once in a while on the PC.
With the way y'got yer system going, I guess you can pair CoD2 & 3 in... oldschool generation?
So... will Detroit become a bustling metropolis again?
x.x
Sweet.
I look forward to dual-wielding silenced, laser-sighted and ACOG-equipped silverballers.
CoD2 community is still quite big over on the PC.
While CoD4's community is just gargantuan (though I suspect that majority of the population has pirated copies)
It all depends how well BlackOps performs to sway the crowd over.
It's supposed to be an 'expansion'.
It would require BC2 to run, so I would assume it'll be an addon.
Though I don't think there's anything official announced regarding that.
I'd pay $60 to hear snow being crushed realistically too. =)
... and to think there was a time when people thought PD were crazy for putting microphones up to the rear exhaust of cars.